K. Daniel O'Leary
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher M. MurphyShannon-Lee MeyerThomas D. BorkovecCharles DiamentRaymond G. RomanczykRonald N. KentIain D. GilchristAilie Turton
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers)Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers)
- Journals
- American PsychologistJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
K. Daniel O'Leary
13 papers receiving 682 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Clinical Psychology 264
- Health 205
- Cognitive Neuroscience 200
- Social Psychology 179
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 141
Countries citing papers authored by K. Daniel O'Leary
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Daniel O'Leary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Daniel O'Leary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Daniel O'Leary more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. Daniel O'Leary
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Daniel O'Leary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Daniel O'Leary. The network helps show where K. Daniel O'Leary may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Daniel O'Leary
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Daniel O'Leary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Daniel O'Leary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Daniel O'Leary. K. Daniel O'Leary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 108 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 116 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 146 |
About K. Daniel O'Leary
K. Daniel O'Leary is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 13 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (264 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (141 citations). K. Daniel O'Leary has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher M. Murphy, Shannon-Lee Meyer, Thomas D. Borkovec, Charles Diament, Raymond G. Romanczyk, Ronald N. Kent, Iain D. Gilchrist, Ailie Turton, Annmarie Caño and Jennifer Langhinrichsen‐Rohling. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.