W. Daniel Hale

41 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

W. Daniel Hale
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Applied Psychology 135
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 31
  • Health 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 215
  • Clinical Psychology 312
Replace Gonzalo Hervás with:
Gonzalo Hervás Spain
Meinrad Perrez Switzerland
Jacob Lomranz Israel
Norman Abeles United States
James C. Coyne United States
Sunil Bhar Australia
Larry H. Strasburger United States
Peggy J. Cantrell United States
Nancy D. Vogeltanz United States
Brett Marroquín United States
W. Daniel Hale relative to Gonzalo Hervás Spain Gonzalo Hervás's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gonzalo Hervás · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Daniel Hale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Daniel Hale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Daniel Hale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Daniel Hale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Daniel Hale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Daniel Hale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Daniel Hale. The network helps show where W. Daniel Hale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Daniel Hale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Daniel Hale Line = papers co-authored together W. Daniel Hale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978122
2 198572
3 197568
4 197666
5 198448
6 197645
7 199242
8 202038
9 198437
10 198230
11 198425
12 200822
13 202122
14 199720
15 201518
16 199216
17 202115
18 200314
19 201913
20 201713

About W. Daniel Hale

W. Daniel Hale is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers) and Health and Wellbeing Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (135 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (31 citations), Health (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (215 citations) and Clinical Psychology (312 citations). W. Daniel Hale has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bonnie R. Strickland, Panagis Galiatsatos, Linda K. Anderson, Matt Vassar, Sherita Hill Golden, Richard G. Bennett, Denna Wheeler, Katie E. Nelson, Ellen B. Taylor and Nicole L. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religion and Health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact