K. Böhm

30 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

K. Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Cell Biology 240
  • Structural Biology 18
  • Ocean Engineering 143
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 461
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 243
Replace Anita Jannasch with:
Anita Jannasch Germany
Masatoshi Ichikawa Japan
Karin John France
Jens‐Christian Meiners United States
Masayoshi Nishiyama Japan
Daniel Midtvedt Sweden
Rizal F. Hariadi United States
Xomalin G. Peralta United States
Alexandra Ros United States
Doris Heinrich Germany
K. Böhm relative to Anita Jannasch Germany Anita Jannasch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Anita Jannasch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Böhm. The network helps show where K. Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Böhm Line = papers co-authored together K. Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981141
2 2002115
3 199077
4 198374
5 199471
6 199770
7 198164
8 200057
9 197955
10 198253
11 198331
12 199524
13 199720
14 199719
15 200517
16 201917
17
CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF AGED TRANSFORMER BUSHING INSULATIONS
200616
18 198712
19 199110
20 19877

About K. Böhm

K. Böhm is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Ocean Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (11 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (8 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (6 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), 14-3-3 protein interactions (3 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (2 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (240 citations), Structural Biology (18 citations), Ocean Engineering (143 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (461 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (243 citations). K. Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Eberhard Unger, Ε. Weidel, K. Petermann, R Stracke, R. Ulrich, W Vater, B. Fischer, Jack A. Tuszyński, Leo Wollweber and P. Russer. Their work appears in journals such as Electronics Letters, Optics Letters, Journal of Basic Microbiology, Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact