Jurre den Haan
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Femke H. BouwmanFrank D. VerbraakPieter Jelle VisserPhilip ScheltensAnnemieke J.M. RozemüllerJeroen J.M. HoozemansTjado H. J. MorremaJacoba A. van de Kreeke
- Topics
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis (13 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jurre den Haan
25 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Ophthalmology 572
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 536
- Physiology 325
- Molecular Biology 246
- Neurology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Jurre den Haan
This map shows the geographic impact of Jurre den Haan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jurre den Haan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jurre den Haan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jurre den Haan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jurre den Haan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jurre den Haan. The network helps show where Jurre den Haan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jurre den Haan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jurre den Haan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jurre den Haan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jurre den Haan. Jurre den Haan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 105 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 147 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 186 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). | 5 |
| 17 | [From gene to disease; from Notch3 to cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy]. | 2 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About Jurre den Haan
Jurre den Haan is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (13 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (572 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (536 citations) and Neurology (175 citations). Jurre den Haan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Femke H. Bouwman, Frank D. Verbraak, Pieter Jelle Visser, Philip Scheltens, Annemieke J.M. Rozemüller, Jeroen J.M. Hoozemans, Tjado H. J. Morrema, Jacoba A. van de Kreeke, Johannes F. de Boer and Arthur A. Bergen. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Acta Neuropathologica and Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.