June Barrow‐Green
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Theoretical Computer Science top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Topics
- History and Theory of Mathematics (12 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers)Mathematics and Applications (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceHistory and Philosophy of ScienceStatistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong KongNorway
In The Last Decade
June Barrow‐Green
16 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 60
- Theoretical Computer Science 60
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 43
- Geometry and Topology 35
Countries citing papers authored by June Barrow‐Green
This map shows the geographic impact of June Barrow‐Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by June Barrow‐Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites June Barrow‐Green more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by June Barrow‐Green
This network shows the impact of papers produced by June Barrow‐Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by June Barrow‐Green. The network helps show where June Barrow‐Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of June Barrow‐Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of June Barrow‐Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of June Barrow‐Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with June Barrow‐Green. June Barrow‐Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | The History of Mathematics: A Source Based Approach | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | “An exquisite machine”: Olaus Henrici’s harmonic analyser | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | History of Mathematics: Resources on the World Wide Web. | 3 |
| 15 | 139 | |
| 16 | International congresses of mathematicians from Zurich 1897 to Cambridge 1912 | 3 |
| 17 | 15 |
About June Barrow‐Green
June Barrow‐Green is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (12 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (60 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60 citations). June Barrow‐Green has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Gray, Reinhard Siegmund‐Schultze, Joachim Schwermer and Robin Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as The Mathematical Intelligencer, Annals of Science and Archive for History of Exact Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.