Archive for History of Exact Sciences

991 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 991 papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences usually cover Theoretical Computer Science (352 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (244 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (242 papers) specifically the topics of History and Theory of Mathematics (352 papers), Ancient Astronomy and Mathematical Instruments (165 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archive for History of Exact Sciences are Oscar Sheynin, Ellis H. Dill, Gregg Jaeger, Thomas Hawkins, A. Seidenberg, H Bos, Glenn Shafer, Helge Kragh, Olivier Darrigol and Edwin Hewitt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Archive for History of Exact Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archive for History of Exact Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025