Julio Chanamé

1.5k total citations
37 papers, 670 citations indexed

About

Julio Chanamé is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Julio Chanamé has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 670 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 14 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Julio Chanamé's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (32 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (17 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (14 papers). Julio Chanamé is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (32 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (17 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (14 papers). Julio Chanamé collaborates with scholars based in Chile, United States and Brazil. Julio Chanamé's co-authors include Andrew Gould, Jeff J. Andrews, Marcel A. Agüeros, J. Meléndez, I. Ramírez, Jan Kleyna, D. Godoy-Rivera, Roeland P. van der Marel, Jordi Miralda‐Escudé and H. R. A. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

In The Last Decade

Julio Chanamé

33 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Julio Chanamé

INSTR

NHEP

AMPO

P. Arriagada Chile

Jinliang Hou China

Vasily Kokorev Denmark

Gene C. K. Leung United States

Vincent Van Eylen United Kingdom

Masashi Omiya Japan

E. Bica Brazil

Thaíse S. Rodrigues Italy

G. Tautvaišienė Lithuania

P. North Switzerland

P. Arriagada Chile

Julio Chanamé

754 ×1.1

282 ×0.9

INSTR

34 ×0.8

NHEP

24 ×1.1

AMPO

21 ×1.1

Citations per year, relative to Julio Chanamé Julio Chanamé (= 1×) peers P. Arriagada

Countries citing papers authored by Julio Chanamé

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julio Chanamé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julio Chanamé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julio Chanamé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julio Chanamé

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julio Chanamé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julio Chanamé. The network helps show where Julio Chanamé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julio Chanamé

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julio Chanamé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julio Chanamé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julio Chanamé. Julio Chanamé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chanamé, Julio, Camila Navarrete, Yasna Órdenes-Briceño, et al.. (2025). The Distant Milky Way Halo from the Southern Hemisphere: Characterization of the LMC-induced Dynamical Friction Wake*. The Astrophysical Journal. 983(1). 83–83. 1 indexed citations

Andrews, Jeff J., Simon C. Schuler, Jason L. Curtis, et al.. (2025). Evidence for a Catastrophically Disrupted Open Cluster. The Astrophysical Journal. 986(1). 27–27.

Reggiani, Henrique, et al.. (2025). Constraining Extra Mixing During the Main Sequence: Whatever Depletes Lithium Does Not Touch Beryllium*. The Astrophysical Journal. 984(2). 108–108. 2 indexed citations

Chanamé, Julio, et al.. (2024). Are lithium-rich giants binaries? A radial velocity variability analysis of 1400 giants. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 690. A367–A367. 7 indexed citations

Andrews, Jeff J., Marcel A. Agüeros, Phillip A. Cargile, et al.. (2024). Theia 456: Tidally Shredding an Open Cluster. The Astronomical Journal. 168(5). 206–206. 1 indexed citations

Godoy-Rivera, D., et al.. (2023). The breakdown of current gyrochronology as evidenced by old coeval stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 523(4). 5947–5961. 6 indexed citations

Chanamé, Julio, et al.. (2023). Substructure, supernovae, and a time-resolved star formation history for Upper Scorpius. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 522(1). 1288–1309. 17 indexed citations

Chanamé, Julio, et al.. (2022). Mass Matters: No Evidence for Ubiquitous Lithium Production in Low-mass Clump Giants. The Astrophysical Journal. 933(1). 58–58. 15 indexed citations

Andrews, Jeff J., Jason L. Curtis, Julio Chanamé, et al.. (2022). A Young, Low-density Stellar Stream in the Milky Way Disk: Theia 456. The Astronomical Journal. 163(6). 275–275. 14 indexed citations

10.

Jones, M. I., et al.. (2022). Evidence of extra mixing in field giants as traced by the lithium and carbon isotope ratio. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 670. A73–A73. 11 indexed citations

11.

Casamiquela, L., J. Olivares, Y. Tarricq, et al.. (2022). Unravelling UBC 274: A morphological, kinematical, and chemical analysis of a disrupting open cluster. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 664. A31–A31. 8 indexed citations

12.

Chanamé, Julio, et al.. (2021). Improved Constraints on the Initial-to-final Mass Relation of White Dwarfs Using Wide Binaries. The Astrophysical Journal. 923(2). 181–181. 24 indexed citations

13.

Puzia, Thomas H., et al.. (2019). On collision course: The nature of the binary star cluster NGC2006/SL 538. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 3 indexed citations

14.

Ramírez, I., et al.. (2019). The chemical composition of HIP 34407/HIP 34426 and other twin-star comoving pairs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 490(2). 2448–2457. 36 indexed citations

15.

Feng, Fabo, G. Anglada‐Escudé, Mikko Tuomi, et al.. (2019). Detection of the nearest Jupiter analogue in radial velocity and astrometry data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 490(4). 5002–5016. 39 indexed citations

16.

Placco, Vinicius M., Rafael M. Santucci, Timothy C. Beers, et al.. (2019). The R-Process Alliance: Spectroscopic Follow-up of Low-metallicity Star Candidates from the Best & Brightest Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 870(2). 122–122. 14 indexed citations

17.

Chanamé, Julio. (2009). Schwarzschild Models for the Galaxy. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 5(H15). 190–191.

18.

Chanamé, Julio, et al.. (2004). Rotating Models of Low Mass Giants: Rotational Evolution and Surface Abundance Anomalies. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 215. 438–439. 2 indexed citations

19.

Chanamé, Julio, Andrew Gould, & Jordi Miralda‐Escudé. (2001). Microlensing by the Cluster of Black Holes Around Sgr A. arXiv (Cornell University).

20.

Kerber, F., Elise Furlan, M. Roth, Gaspar Galaz, & Julio Chanamé. (2000). Investigating New Planetary Nebulae in the Southern Hemisphere. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 112(770). 542–554. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact