Charli M. Sakari
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Co-authors
- Terese T. HansenIan U. RoedererVinicius M. PlaccoAnna FrebelTimothy C. BeersRana EzzeddineKim A. VennMatthew Shetrone
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (30 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (15 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Charli M. Sakari
32 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 370
- Instrumentation 150
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 73
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 17
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Charli M. Sakari
This map shows the geographic impact of Charli M. Sakari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charli M. Sakari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charli M. Sakari more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charli M. Sakari
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charli M. Sakari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charli M. Sakari. The network helps show where Charli M. Sakari may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charli M. Sakari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charli M. Sakari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charli M. Sakari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charli M. Sakari. Charli M. Sakari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | The R-Process Alliance: A Very Metal-poor, Extremely r-process-enhanced Star with [Eu/Fe] = + 2.2, and the Class of r-III Stars | 16 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Testing r-process nucleosynthesis models with two r-process enhanced stars | 1 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Charli M. Sakari
Charli M. Sakari is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (30 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (15 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (150 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (370 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (73 citations). Charli M. Sakari has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Terese T. Hansen, Ian U. Roederer, Vinicius M. Placco, Anna Frebel, Timothy C. Beers, Rana Ezzeddine, Kim A. Venn, Matthew Shetrone, Aaron Dotter and George Wallerstein. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.