M. Hempel
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- D. MinnitiJ. Alonso-GarcíaR. K. SaitoP. W. LucasJ. P. EmersonJ. I. AriasP. PietrukowiczM. V. Alonso
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (62 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (39 papers)
In The Last Decade
M. Hempel
65 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.5k
- Instrumentation 1.4k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 122
- Computational Mechanics 112
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 75
Countries citing papers authored by M. Hempel
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hempel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hempel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hempel. The network helps show where M. Hempel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hempel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hempel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hempel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hempel. M. Hempel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | Discovery of a pair of classical Cepheids in an invisible cluster beyond the Galactic bulge | 18 |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | VVV Pointed Search for New Galactic Open Clusters | 0 |
| 19 | 81 | |
| 20 | The surface composition of β Pictoris. | 1 |
About M. Hempel
M. Hempel is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (62 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.5k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (122 citations). M. Hempel has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include D. Minniti, J. Alonso-García, R. K. Saito, P. W. Lucas, J. P. Emerson, J. I. Arias, P. Pietrukowicz, M. V. Alonso, M. Kissler‐Patig and A. V. Ahumada. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.