Juliet McMaster
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Themes in Literature Analysis
- Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- History top 10%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 8
- Themes in Literature Analysis 8
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
-
- Literature Analysis and Criticism 12
Juliet McMaster
31 papers receiving 49 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 85
- History 24
- Philosophy 14
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 6
- History and Philosophy of Science 5
Countries citing papers authored by Juliet McMaster
This map shows the geographic impact of Juliet McMaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliet McMaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliet McMaster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juliet McMaster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliet McMaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliet McMaster. The network helps show where Juliet McMaster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Juliet McMaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 4 | Trollope's Palliser Novels: Theme and Pattern | 1978 | 8 |
| 5 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 7 | Jane Austen's business : her world and her profession | 1996 | 6 |
| 8 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 12 | The novel from Sterne to James: Essays on the relation of literature to life | 1981 | 3 |
| 13 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 19 | Jane Austen on Love | 1978 | 3 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2 |
About Juliet McMaster
Juliet McMaster is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 51 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature Analysis and Criticism (12 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (8 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (85 citations), History (24 citations), Philosophy (14 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (6 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Juliet McMaster has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward Copeland and Denis Donoghue. Their work appears in journals such as English studies in Canada, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, Modern Language Quarterly, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 and The Lion and the unicorn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.