Julie E. Norville
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Genetics top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Aging top 0.2%
- Business and International Management top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- George M. ChurchJohn AachJames J. DiCarloPrashant MaliKevin M. EsveltMarc GüellLuhan YangXavier Rios
- Topics
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers)Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers)RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNucleic Acids Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Julie E. Norville
11 papers receiving 8.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Molecular Biology 8.2k
- Genetics 1.8k
- Plant Science 911
- Aging 586
- Business and International Management 540
Countries citing papers authored by Julie E. Norville
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie E. Norville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie E. Norville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie E. Norville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie E. Norville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie E. Norville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie E. Norville. The network helps show where Julie E. Norville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie E. Norville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie E. Norville. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie E. Norville based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie E. Norville. Julie E. Norville is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 311 | |
| 2 | RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9breakdown → | 6968 |
| 3 | Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systemsbreakdown → | 1194 |
| 4 | Improving workplace productivity--it isn't just about reducing absence. | 7 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 289 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | Dissolution of Photoresist Sacrificial Layers in Parylene Microchannels | 3 |
| 12 | 0 |
About Julie E. Norville
Julie E. Norville is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Insect Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 8.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (586 citations), Business and International Management (540 citations) and Molecular Biology (8.2k citations). Julie E. Norville has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include George M. Church, John Aach, James J. DiCarlo, Prashant Mali, Kevin M. Esvelt, Marc Güell, Luhan Yang, Xavier Rios, Michael T. Mee and Marc J. Lajoie. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.