Julia Swallow

680 citations
18 papers · 487 indexed · h-index 9

Julia Swallow

17 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Julia Swallow
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Oncology 279
  • Cancer Research 94
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 115
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • Genetics 85
Replace Katharina Grupp with:
Katharina Grupp Germany
Kristina G. Flores United States
Catherine Parker United States
DG Altman United Kingdom
Hussein Assi United States
Lisa Watson United States
Pilin Wang China
Heather Jenkins Canada
R. Nicholson United Kingdom
Sachiko M. Oshima United States
Julia Swallow relative to Katharina Grupp Germany Katharina Grupp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Katharina Grupp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Swallow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Swallow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Swallow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Swallow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Swallow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Swallow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Swallow. The network helps show where Julia Swallow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Julia Swallow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Swallow Line = papers co-authored together Julia Swallow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20243
3 20235
4 20237
5 20231
6 20235
7 202111
8 20211
9 20215
10 202111
11 202010
12 201933
13 20193
14 201916
15 201819
16 201812
17 201722
18
Alterations to either c-erbB-2(neu) or c-myc proto-oncogenes in breast carcinomas correlate with poor short-term prognosis.
1987321

About Julia Swallow

Julia Swallow is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geography, Planning and Development and Philosophy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (3 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (279 citations), Cancer Research (94 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (115 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations) and Genetics (85 citations). Julia Swallow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include JM Varley, William J. Brammar, R. A. Walker, Anne Kerr, Sarah Cunningham‐Burley, Alexandra Hillman, Emily Ross, Sonja Erikainen, Ângela Marques Filipe and Martyn Pickersgill. Their work appears in journals such as New Genetics and Society, Social Science & Medicine, Social Studies of Science, Sociology of Health & Illness and Medical Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026