Julia Schückel
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Co-authors
- William G. T. WillatsStjepan Krešimir KračunPhillip B. PopeAdrian E. NaasVincent G. H. EijsinkA.K. MacKenzieAnscha J.J. ZietsmanJozef Mravec
- Topics
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (9 papers)Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (7 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Julia Schückel
32 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Plant Science 425
- Molecular Biology 417
- Food Science 229
- Biomedical Engineering 222
- Biotechnology 164
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schückel
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schückel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schückel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schückel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schückel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schückel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schückel. The network helps show where Julia Schückel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Schückel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Schückel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Schückel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Schückel. Julia Schückel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 121 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition. | 1 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Julia Schückel
Julia Schückel is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Plant Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (9 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (7 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (164 citations), Biochemistry (95 citations) and Food Science (229 citations). Julia Schückel has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include William G. T. Willats, Stjepan Krešimir Kračun, Phillip B. Pope, Adrian E. Naas, Vincent G. H. Eijsink, A.K. MacKenzie, Anscha J.J. Zietsman, Jozef Mravec, Andrew S. French and John P. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.