Julia Schmitt

22 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Julia Schmitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Biochemistry 16
  • Neurology 26
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 36
  • Pollution 17
  • Filtration and Separation 3
Replace Paul Howroyd with:
Paul Howroyd United States
B. Martin United Kingdom
Ellen O’Connor United States
Miller Re United States
Yanfei Chen China
Réjane Beugnot France
Hiromichi Inoue Japan
James M. Kleeman United States
D M Hyde United States
Julia Schmitt relative to Paul Howroyd United States Paul Howroyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Paul Howroyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schmitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schmitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schmitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schmitt. The network helps show where Julia Schmitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Schmitt Line = papers co-authored together Julia Schmitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 196726
3 201623
4 199219
5 201219
6 202215
7 202112
8 201612
9 19689
10 20169
11 20167
12 20206
13 19646
14 20164
15 20223
16 19823
17
[Sensitivity of Bifidibacterium bifidum to 11 antibiotics].
19592
18
[Remarks apropos of 260 bacteria isolated from suppurative meningitis].
19601
19
[Abdominal form of Wilson's disease. Detection of copper in the tissues by X fluorescence].
19681
20
[Detection of tissue copper by x-ray spectrography. Significance for the systematic detection of Wilson's defect].
19691

About Julia Schmitt

Julia Schmitt is a scholar working on Neurology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (16 citations), Neurology (26 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (36 citations), Pollution (17 citations) and Filtration and Separation (3 citations). Julia Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Meinhart H. Zenk, Olivia Rasigraf, Mike S. M. Jetten, Claudia Lüke, Eckhard Leistner, Bernd J. Pichler, Rupert Handgretinger, Insa Joost, Mathias Herrmann and Markus Bischoff. Their work appears in journals such as Oncotarget, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Microbiology and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact