Neurogastroenterology & Motility

4.5k papers and 125.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility in the last decades have received a total of 125.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility usually cover Gastroenterology (3.2k papers), Surgery (1.9k papers) and Physiology (931 papers) specifically the topics of Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2.4k papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (1.4k papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (573 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurogastroenterology & Motility are Michael Camilleri, Albert J. Bredenoord, Jan Tack, John E. Pandolfino, John F. Cryan, Mark Fox, Peter J. Kahrilas, Adil E. Bharucha, C. Prakash Gyawali and A. J. P. M. Smout.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility.

Countries where authors publish in Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurogastroenterology & Motility more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025