Julia O’Connell
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- History and Developments in Astronomy
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 4
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 4
- Co-authors
- Matthew W. Muterspaugh (3 shared papers)Benjamin F. Lane (3 shared papers)M. M. Colavita (3 shared papers)S. R. Kulkarni (3 shared papers)B. F. Burke (3 shared papers)Sloane Wiktorowicz (3 shared papers)M. Konacki (3 shared papers)Christian I. Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Astronomical Journal (1 paper)Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (1 paper)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (1 paper)arXiv (Cornell University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Julia O’Connell
3 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Instrumentation 30
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 61
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 20
- Computational Mechanics 10
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Julia O’Connell
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia O’Connell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia O’Connell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia O’Connell. The network helps show where Julia O’Connell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Julia O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 0 |
About Julia O’Connell
Julia O’Connell is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 63 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (1 paper), Scientific Research and Discoveries (1 paper), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1 paper) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (30 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (20 citations), Computational Mechanics (10 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6 citations). Julia O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Matthew W. Muterspaugh, Benjamin F. Lane, M. M. Colavita, S. R. Kulkarni, B. F. Burke, Sloane Wiktorowicz, M. Konacki, Christian I. Johnson, Michael H. Williamson and Minhua Shao. Their work appears in journals such as The Astronomical Journal, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and arXiv (Cornell University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.