Stephen Kaye

3.2k total citations
8 papers, 80 citations indexed

About

Stephen Kaye is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Kaye has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 80 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Instrumentation, 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Stephen Kaye's work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers). Stephen Kaye is often cited by papers focused on Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers). Stephen Kaye collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Stephen Kaye's co-authors include Eric C. Bellm, Roger M. Smith, M. E. Levi, Paul Gardner, M. Hoff, S. R. Kulkarni, Khanh Bui, Richard Dekany, Dan Reiley and John Cromer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets and Institutional Repository of Xi'an Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics).

In The Last Decade

Stephen Kaye

8 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Kaye United States	4	54	20	18	18	10	8	80
S. S. Eikenberry United States	6	56 1.0×	16 0.8×	21 1.2×	11 0.6×	11 1.1×	13	79
Christopher J. Mottram United Kingdom	5	64 1.2×	24 1.2×	19 1.1×	10 0.6×	16 1.6×	10	88
Eszter Pozna Germany	5	55 1.0×	36 1.8×	25 1.4×	11 0.6×	6 0.6×	10	79
B. P. Crill United States	6	70 1.3×	15 0.8×	23 1.3×	9 0.5×	19 1.9×	13	86
D. Gojak Germany	5	61 1.1×	30 1.5×	20 1.1×	14 0.8×	7 0.7×	8	80
Daigo Tomono Japan	6	84 1.6×	31 1.6×	34 1.9×	20 1.1×	8 0.8×	17	115
Roger Smith United States	5	46 0.9×	23 1.1×	32 1.8×	23 1.3×	10 1.0×	7	78
Takao Soyano Japan	6	61 1.1×	18 0.9×	14 0.8×	8 0.4×	8 0.8×	20	82
Pierre-Henri Carton France	5	35 0.6×	20 1.0×	9 0.5×	8 0.4×	10 1.0×	10	60
Gotthard Huster Germany	4	60 1.1×	22 1.1×	13 0.7×	10 0.6×	8 0.8×	9	74

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Kaye

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Kaye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Kaye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Kaye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Kaye

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Kaye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Kaye. The network helps show where Stephen Kaye may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Kaye

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Kaye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Kaye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Kaye. Stephen Kaye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Mohite, S. R., Shreya Anand, D. L. Kaplan, et al.. (2022). Inferring Kilonova Population Properties with a Hierarchical Bayesian Framework. I. Nondetection Methodology and Single-event Analyses. The Astrophysical Journal. 925(1). 58–58. 5 indexed citations

2.

Steidel, Charles C., Eric W. Peng, Jason Fucik, et al.. (2022). Design and development of WFOS, the Wide-Field Optical Spectrograph for the Thirty Meter Telescope. Institutional Repository of Xi'an Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Xian Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics). 7014. 74–74. 2 indexed citations

3.

Ward, Charlotte, Suvi Gezari, Sara Frederick, et al.. (2021). AGNs on the Move: A Search for Off-nuclear AGNs from Recoiling Supermassive Black Holes and Ongoing Galaxy Mergers with the Zwicky Transient Facility. The Astrophysical Journal. 913(2). 102–102. 21 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Roger M. & Stephen Kaye. (2018). CCD speed-noise optimization at 1 MHz. 9154. 36–36. 1 indexed citations

5.

Riddle, Reed, John Cromer, David Hale, et al.. (2018). The Zwicky transient facility robotic observing system (Conference Presentation). 11–11. 1 indexed citations

6.

Dekany, Richard G., Roger M. Smith, Justin Belicki, et al.. (2016). The Zwicky Transient Facility Camera. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9908. 99085M–99085M. 8 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Roger M., Richard Dekany, C. Bebek, et al.. (2014). The Zwicky transient facility observing system. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9147. 914779–914779. 39 indexed citations

8.

Kaye, Stephen, et al.. (1972). An In-Situ Monitor for HC1 and HF. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 9(11). 836–841. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact