Julia L. Briskin
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Brent W. RobertsMichael InzlichtKaitlyn M. WernerRichard B. SlatcherDavid A. SbarraCatalina KöpetzJacqueline WoernerSusan A. Gelman
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers)Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers)
- Journals
- Annual Review of PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julia L. Briskin
11 papers receiving 471 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Social Psychology 173
- Applied Psychology 169
- Sociology and Political Science 145
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
- Clinical Psychology 120
Countries citing papers authored by Julia L. Briskin
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia L. Briskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia L. Briskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia L. Briskin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia L. Briskin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia L. Briskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia L. Briskin. The network helps show where Julia L. Briskin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia L. Briskin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia L. Briskin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia L. Briskin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia L. Briskin. Julia L. Briskin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Integrating Models of Self-Regulationbreakdown → | 310 |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 12 |
About Julia L. Briskin
Julia L. Briskin is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (169 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations) and General Decision Sciences (19 citations). Julia L. Briskin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brent W. Roberts, Michael Inzlicht, Kaitlyn M. Werner, Richard B. Slatcher, David A. Sbarra, Catalina Köpetz, Jacqueline Woerner, Susan A. Gelman, Ariana Orvell and Özlem Ayduk. Their work appears in journals such as Annual Review of Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.