Sarah C. E. Stanton

1.5k total citations
53 papers, 878 citations indexed

About

Sarah C. E. Stanton is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah C. E. Stanton has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 878 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Social Psychology, 22 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 14 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah C. E. Stanton's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers). Sarah C. E. Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers). Sarah C. E. Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Sarah C. E. Stanton's co-authors include Lorne Campbell, Allison K. Farrell, Richard B. Slatcher, Anthony D. Ong, Emre Selçuk, Jennifer Pink, Laura M. Vowels, Emily A. Impett, Katherine B. Carnelley and James J. Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Sarah C. E. Stanton

49 papers receiving 854 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah C. E. Stanton United Kingdom 18 526 296 263 225 109 53 878
Courtney L. Gosnell United States 7 516 1.0× 321 1.1× 151 0.6× 234 1.0× 89 0.8× 9 789
Brett K. Jakubiak United States 14 539 1.0× 207 0.7× 230 0.9× 218 1.0× 97 0.9× 26 804
Ruth Yasemin Erol Switzerland 7 464 0.9× 403 1.4× 226 0.9× 192 0.9× 96 0.9× 8 857
Janina Larissa Bühler Switzerland 11 392 0.7× 299 1.0× 193 0.7× 172 0.8× 91 0.8× 27 762
Andrea L. Meltzer United States 20 594 1.1× 410 1.4× 484 1.8× 361 1.6× 73 0.7× 54 1.1k
Keith Sanford United States 20 474 0.9× 439 1.5× 114 0.4× 205 0.9× 61 0.6× 47 916
Gloria Luong United States 15 551 1.0× 248 0.8× 251 1.0× 195 0.9× 108 1.0× 31 1.1k
M. Brent Donnellan United States 15 425 0.8× 465 1.6× 206 0.8× 279 1.2× 108 1.0× 29 985
Nathalie Meuwly Switzerland 14 664 1.3× 485 1.6× 147 0.6× 524 2.3× 136 1.2× 28 1.2k
Danu Anthony Stinson Canada 14 414 0.8× 198 0.7× 205 0.8× 257 1.1× 139 1.3× 28 775

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah C. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah C. E. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah C. E. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah C. E. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah C. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah C. E. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah C. E. Stanton. The network helps show where Sarah C. E. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah C. E. Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah C. E. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah C. E. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah C. E. Stanton. Sarah C. E. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MacCormack, Jennifer K., et al.. (2024). The role of perceived negative partner behavior in daily snacking behavior: A dynamical systems approach. Appetite. 199. 107393–107393.
2.
Stanton, Sarah C. E., et al.. (2024). The Link between the Nature of the Human–Companion Animal Relationship and Well-Being Outcomes in Companion Animal Owners. Animals. 14(3). 441–441. 15 indexed citations
3.
Stanton, Sarah C. E., et al.. (2024). Development and validation of the Companion Animals Self-Expansion Scale. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
4.
Loughnan, Steve, et al.. (2024). The Associations between Human–Companion Animal Relationship Duration, Companion Animal Life Stage, and Relationship Quality. Animals. 14(11). 1606–1606. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ogolsky, Brian G., et al.. (2023). So where do you see this going? The effects of commitment asymmetry and asynchrony on relationship satisfaction and break‐up. European Journal of Social Psychology. 53(5). 890–905. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gordon, Amie M., et al.. (2023). Daily Sleep Quality and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Negative Affect and Perspective-Taking. Affective Science. 4(2). 370–384. 7 indexed citations
7.
Farrell, Allison K., et al.. (2023). Relationship quality and physical health: Responsiveness as an active ingredient predicting health across the lifespan. Current Opinion in Psychology. 52. 101628–101628. 1 indexed citations
8.
Stanton, Sarah C. E., et al.. (2021). Mindfulness and Attachment Change in Couples Over Time. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints).
9.
Vowels, Laura M., Katherine B. Carnelley, & Sarah C. E. Stanton. (2021). Attachment anxiety predicts worse mental health outcomes during COVID-19: Evidence from two studies. Personality and Individual Differences. 185. 111256–111256. 30 indexed citations
10.
Farrell, Allison K., Sarah C. E. Stanton, & David A. Sbarra. (2021). Good theories in need of better data: Combining clinical and social psychological approaches to study the mechanisms linking relationships and health. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh). 1 indexed citations
12.
Loughnan, Steve, et al.. (2020). What factors attract people to play romantic video games?. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0231535–e0231535. 12 indexed citations
13.
Farrell, Allison K. & Sarah C. E. Stanton. (2019). Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Links Between Close Relationships and Physical Health. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28(5). 483–489. 24 indexed citations
14.
Fiszbein, Ariel & Sarah C. E. Stanton. (2018). The Future of Education in Latin America and the Caribbean : possibilities for United States Invesment and Engagement. MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN. 5 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, Lorne & Sarah C. E. Stanton. (2018). Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology. 25. 148–151. 59 indexed citations
16.
Muise, Amy, Sarah C. E. Stanton, James J. Kim, & Emily A. Impett. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner’s sexual desire in established intimate relationships.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 110(5). 725–742. 47 indexed citations
17.
Campbell, Lorne & Sarah C. E. Stanton. (2014). The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences in Relationship Formation: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and Why It Matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 8(9). 485–494. 29 indexed citations
18.
Stanton, Sarah C. E. & Lorne Campbell. (2014). Perceived Social Support Moderates the Link between Attachment Anxiety and Health Outcomes. PLoS ONE. 9(4). e95358–e95358. 45 indexed citations
19.
Apostolopoulos, Yorghos, Sevil Sönmez, Mona Shattell, et al.. (2011). Cruising for Truckers on Highways and the Internet: Sexual Networks and Infection Risk. AIDS Education and Prevention. 23(3). 249–266. 15 indexed citations
20.
Stanton, Sarah C. E. & Martin Banham. (1996). Cambridge paperback guide to theatre. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026