Sarah C. E. Stanton

1.6k citations
54 papers · 909 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah C. E. Stanton

51 papers receiving 885 citations

Peers

Sarah C. E. Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Social Psychology 505
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 253
  • Clinical Psychology 266
  • Health 75
Replace Heidi L. Fritz with:
Heidi L. Fritz United States
Nathalie Meuwly Switzerland
Andrea L. Meltzer United States
Danu Anthony Stinson Canada
Bonnie M. Le Canada
Courtney L. Gosnell United States
Richard E. Mattson United States
Samantha Krauss Switzerland
Jennifer Ragan United States
Keith Sanford United States
Sarah C. E. Stanton relative to Heidi L. Fritz United States Heidi L. Fritz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Heidi L. Fritz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah C. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah C. E. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah C. E. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah C. E. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah C. E. Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah C. E. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah C. E. Stanton. The network helps show where Sarah C. E. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah C. E. Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah C. E. Stanton Line = papers co-authored together Sarah C. E. Stanton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201668
2 201862
3 201760
4 201859
5 201648
6 201447
7 201339
8 199939
9 201737
10 202130
11 201429
12 201827
13 201626
14 201924
15 202220
16 202019
17 201418
18 201118
19 201717
20 202417

About Sarah C. E. Stanton

Sarah C. E. Stanton is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (505 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (253 citations), Clinical Psychology (266 citations) and Health (75 citations). Sarah C. E. Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lorne Campbell, Allison K. Farrell, Richard B. Slatcher, Anthony D. Ong, Emre Selçuk, Jennifer Pink, Steve Loughnan, Katherine B. Carnelley, Emily A. Impett and Laura M. Vowels. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Current Opinion in Psychology, Animals, Personal Relationships and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact