Julia Chen‐Sankey

1.4k citations
81 papers · 960 indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Chen‐Sankey

77 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers

Julia Chen‐Sankey
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Applied Psychology 239
  • Physiology 736
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 282
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 107
  • Health 52
Replace Eric N. Lindblom with:
Eric N. Lindblom United States
Steven Binns United States
Jennifer Cornacchione Ross United States
Mary Hrywna United States
Lauren Collins United States
Kathleen R. Case United States
Lauren Porter United States
Haneen Abudayyeh United States
Morgane Bennett United States
Kymberle L. Sterling United States
Julia Chen‐Sankey relative to Eric N. Lindblom United States Eric N. Lindblom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Eric N. Lindblom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Chen‐Sankey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Chen‐Sankey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Chen‐Sankey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Chen‐Sankey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Chen‐Sankey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Chen‐Sankey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Chen‐Sankey. The network helps show where Julia Chen‐Sankey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Chen‐Sankey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Chen‐Sankey Line = papers co-authored together Julia Chen‐Sankey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20241
4 20241
5 20244
6 20241
7 20242
8 20233
9 20233
10 20237
11 20231
12 20238
13 202216
14 20222
15 202125
16 20219
17 20207
18 20203
19 20192
20 201836

About Julia Chen‐Sankey

Julia Chen‐Sankey is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Physiology, Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 81 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (66 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (22 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (19 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Media Influence and Health (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (239 citations), Physiology (736 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (282 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (107 citations) and Health (52 citations). Julia Chen‐Sankey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kelvin Choi, Dina L. G. Borzekowski, Erin L. Mead, Jennifer B. Unger, Kerry M. Green, Jeff Niederdeppe, Edward M. Bernat, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Maansi Bansal‐Travers and Cristine D. Delnevo. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Tobacco Control, Addictive Behaviors and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026