Julia C. Babcock
- Health top 0.1%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Charles E. GreenChet RobieJohn M. GottmanNeil S. JacobsonJennifer WaltzJody M. RossChristopher I. EckhardtSeth T. Pardo
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (58 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (31 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Abnormal PsychologyClinical Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Julia C. Babcock
78 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Health 2.6k
- Clinical Psychology 1.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
- Social Psychology 1.5k
- Gender Studies 756
Countries citing papers authored by Julia C. Babcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia C. Babcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia C. Babcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia C. Babcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia C. Babcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia C. Babcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia C. Babcock. The network helps show where Julia C. Babcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia C. Babcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia C. Babcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia C. Babcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia C. Babcock. Julia C. Babcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 72 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatmentbreakdown → | 904 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 261 |
About Julia C. Babcock
Julia C. Babcock is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (58 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (31 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (2.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations) and Gender Studies (756 citations). Julia C. Babcock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Charles E. Green, Chet Robie, John M. Gottman, Neil S. Jacobson, Jennifer Waltz, Jody M. Ross, Christopher I. Eckhardt, Seth T. Pardo, Carla Sharp and Sarah Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.