D.E.M. Verweij

463 total citations
22 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

D.E.M. Verweij is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, D.E.M. Verweij has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Philosophy and 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in D.E.M. Verweij's work include War, Ethics, and Justification (11 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (7 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (6 papers). D.E.M. Verweij is often cited by papers focused on War, Ethics, and Justification (11 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (7 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (6 papers). D.E.M. Verweij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Norway. D.E.M. Verweij's co-authors include Tine Molendijk, Bert Molewijk, Ellen Giebels, Guy Widdershoven, Joseph Soeters, Annelieke N. Drogendijk, Willemijn Verkoren, Annika Smit, Eric Vermetten and René Moelker and has published in prestigious journals such as Business & Society, Science Technology & Human Values and Culture Medicine and Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

D.E.M. Verweij

22 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D.E.M. Verweij Netherlands	10	120	79	47	42	40	22	250
Jan Steutel Netherlands	10	87 0.7×	34 0.4×	29 0.6×	20 0.5×	16 0.4×	32	260
Stephen R. Holmes United Kingdom	7	115 1.0×	49 0.6×	44 0.9×	5 0.1×	13 0.3×	31	289
Terry A. Maroney United States	7	133 1.1×	46 0.6×	11 0.2×	4 0.1×	46 1.1×	21	292
Edmund L. Pincoffs United States	8	61 0.5×	14 0.2×	48 1.0×	62 1.5×	59 1.5×	15	261
Claudia Pineda‐Marín Colombia	7	110 0.9×	58 0.7×	16 0.3×	10 0.2×	8 0.2×	29	193
George Koutsouris United Kingdom	11	66 0.6×	40 0.5×	5 0.1×	9 0.2×	10 0.3×	29	334
Jacques Lagrange	5	126 1.1×	74 0.9×	41 0.9×	2 0.0×	10 0.3×	9	248
Chris W. Surprenant United States	7	86 0.7×	21 0.3×	21 0.4×	8 0.2×	21 0.5×	23	176
Declan Fahie Ireland	8	149 1.2×	32 0.4×	7 0.1×	12 0.3×	5 0.1×	12	319
Adriano Henrique Nuernberg Brazil	10	103 0.9×	56 0.7×	4 0.1×	23 0.5×	46 1.1×	40	262

Countries citing papers authored by D.E.M. Verweij

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.E.M. Verweij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.E.M. Verweij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.E.M. Verweij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.E.M. Verweij

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.E.M. Verweij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.E.M. Verweij. The network helps show where D.E.M. Verweij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.E.M. Verweij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.E.M. Verweij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.E.M. Verweij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.E.M. Verweij. D.E.M. Verweij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2023). “This Is Not What I Signed up for”: Sociotechnical Imaginaries, Expectations, and Disillusionment in a Dutch Military Innovation Hub. Science Technology & Human Values. 50(4). 857–878. 9 indexed citations

Molendijk, Tine, et al.. (2022). Contextual dimensions of moral injury: An interdisciplinary review. Military Psychology. 34(6). 742–753. 25 indexed citations

Giebels, Ellen, et al.. (2020). On moral grounds: Moral identity and moral disengagement in relation to military deployment. Military Psychology. 32(4). 363–375. 6 indexed citations

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2018). The safety paradox in ethics training: a case study on safety dynamics within a military ethics train-the-trainer course. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 22(1). 107–117. 5 indexed citations

Molendijk, Tine, et al.. (2018). Moral Aspects of “Moral Injury”: Analyzing Conceptualizations on the Role of Morality in Military Trauma. Journal of Military Ethics. 17(1). 36–53. 43 indexed citations

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2017). What Sticks? The Evaluation of a Train-the-Trainer Course in Military Ethics and its Perceived Outcomes. Journal of Military Ethics. 16(1-2). 56–77. 15 indexed citations

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2017). The relevance of Foucauldian art-of-living for ethics education in a military context: Theory and practice. Journal of Moral Education. 47(1). 126–143. 4 indexed citations

Giebels, Ellen, et al.. (2016). Sensemaking in Military Critical Incidents: The Impact of Moral Intensity. Business & Society. 58(4). 749–778. 13 indexed citations

Molendijk, Tine, et al.. (2015). Conflicting Notions on Violence and PTSD in the Military: Institutional and Personal Narratives of Combat-Related Illness. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry. 40(3). 338–360. 11 indexed citations

10.

Widdershoven, Guy, et al.. (2015). Moral dilemmas in a military context. A case study of a train the trainer course on military ethics. Journal of Moral Education. 44(4). 457–478. 20 indexed citations

11.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2014). Moral Emotions during Military Deployments of Dutch Forces. Armed Forces & Society. 41(4). 616–638. 12 indexed citations

12.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2014). The Disciplinary Gaze of the Camera's Eye: Soldiers' Conscience and Moral Responsibility. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 15(3). 5–22. 1 indexed citations

13.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2014). Emotional Reactions and Moral Judgment: The Effects of Morally Challenging Interactions in Military Operations. Ethics & Behavior. 26(1). 14–31. 20 indexed citations

14.

Moelker, René, et al.. (2013). Moral Responsibility & Military Effectiveness. 3 indexed citations

15.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2009). The Moral Dimension of Asymmetrical Warfare: Counter-Terrorism, Democratic Values and Military Ethics. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 7 indexed citations

16.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2008). Inquiry, criticism and reasonableness : Socratic dialogue as. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 9(2). 54–72. 2 indexed citations

17.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2008). Inquiry, Criticism and Reasonableness: Socratic Dialogue as a Research Method?. 7 indexed citations

18.

Verweij, D.E.M.. (2007). Comrades or Friends? On Friendship in the Armed Forces. Journal of Military Ethics. 6(4). 280–291. 12 indexed citations

19.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2007). Moral Judgement within the Armed Forces. Journal of Military Ethics. 6(1). 19–40. 20 indexed citations

20.

Verweij, D.E.M., et al.. (2006). Military Ethics: The Dutch Approach: A Practical Guide. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact