Nick Smith

453 total citations
22 papers, 233 citations indexed

About

Nick Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Nick Smith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 233 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Social Psychology, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Nick Smith's work include Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers). Nick Smith is often cited by papers focused on Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers). Nick Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Norway. Nick Smith's co-authors include N. Ángel Pinillos, Ken Czerwinski, Chris R. Colocousis, Stefan Sobolowski, Cesar J. Rebellon and Nicole E. Negowetti and has published in prestigious journals such as Separation Science and Technology, Mind & Language and Society.

In The Last Decade

Nick Smith

17 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Nick Smith
Amy Olberding United States
Glen Pettigrove New Zealand
Terry A. Maroney United States
Michele Stephen Australia
Jules Holroyd United Kingdom
Joshua Dressler United States
Michelle Mason United States
Linda Radzik United States
Nick Smith
Citations per year, relative to Nick Smith Nick Smith (= 1×) peers Douglas A. Pryer

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Smith. The network helps show where Nick Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Smith. Nick Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Nick. (2022). An Inventory and Index for Political Apologies. Global Studies Quarterly. 2(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Nick. (2020). Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Society. 57(6). 698–703. 1 indexed citations
4.
Colocousis, Chris R., Cesar J. Rebellon, Nick Smith, & Stefan Sobolowski. (2015). How long can we keep doing this? Sustainability as a strictly temporal concept. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 7(2). 274–287. 3 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Nick. (2014). Interview with Jeremy Rifkin. Engineering & Technology. 9(7). 52–55.
6.
Smith, Nick. (2014). Justice through Apologies. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Nick. (2014). Justice through Apologies Remorse, Reform, and Punishment. 10 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Nick. (2013). Just Apologies: An Overview of the Philosophical Issues. Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University). 13(1). 3.
9.
Smith, Nick. (2013). Against Court-Ordered Apologies. New Criminal Law Review. 16(1). 1–49. 2 indexed citations
10.
Pinillos, N. Ángel, et al.. (2011). Philosophy's New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action. Mind & Language. 26(1). 115–139. 48 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Nick, et al.. (2011). Apologies and Fitness to Practice Law: A Practical Framework for Evaluating Remorse in the Bar Admission Process. 1 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Nick. (2010). Kantian Restorative Justice?. Criminal Justice Ethics. 29(1). 54–69. 1 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Nick, et al.. (2010). Method for Online Process Monitoring for Use in Solvent Extraction and Actinide Separations. Separation Science and Technology. 45(12-13). 1763–1768. 13 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Nick. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on continental philosophy of law. Continental Philosophy Review. 42(1). 1–4. 2 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Nick. (2009). Commodification in law: ideologies, intractabilities, and hyperboles. Continental Philosophy Review. 42(1). 101–129. 1 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Nick. (2008). Poverty, money, and happiness. University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester).
17.
Smith, Nick. (2008). Why Hardcore Goes Soft: Adorno, Japanese Noise, and the Extirpation of Dissonance. 2 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Nick. (2003). Giovanna Borradori, Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Continental Philosophy Review. 36(3). 335–343. 2 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Nick. (1992). The Spirit of Modernity and its Fate: Jürgen Habermas. Radical philosophy. 60. 1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Nick, et al.. (1982). Property. Indiana Law Review. 15(1). 319–366. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026