Judith R. Meakin
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- R.M. AspdenD.W.L. HukinsFiona J. GilbertKheng Lim GohFrancis W. SmithThomas W. RedpathJ.S. GregoryArduino A. Mangoni
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (34 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers)Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Judith R. Meakin
59 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Surgery 803
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 698
- Pharmacology 598
- Biomedical Engineering 477
- Physiology 209
Countries citing papers authored by Judith R. Meakin
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith R. Meakin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith R. Meakin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith R. Meakin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith R. Meakin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith R. Meakin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith R. Meakin. The network helps show where Judith R. Meakin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith R. Meakin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith R. Meakin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith R. Meakin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith R. Meakin. Judith R. Meakin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 150 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | STRESSES ON THE DISCS IN DIFFERENT POSTURES | 1 |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 71 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 77 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | Sheep, deer and cow intervertebral discs as models for investigating disc replacement | 1 |
| 20 | 20 |
About Judith R. Meakin
Judith R. Meakin is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Health Informatics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (34 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (698 citations), Pharmacology (598 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (198 citations). Judith R. Meakin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include R.M. Aspden, D.W.L. Hukins, D.W.L. Hukins, Fiona J. Gilbert, Kheng Lim Goh, Francis W. Smith, Thomas W. Redpath, J.S. Gregory, Arduino A. Mangoni and Stuart R. Gray. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.