T. S. Keller

35 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

T. S. Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 395
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 583
  • Pharmacology 405
  • Surgery 525
  • Biomedical Engineering 414
Replace M. Arand with:
M. Arand Germany
Tony S. Keller United States
Vikas V. Patel United States
Choll W. Kim United States
S R Garfin United States
Jeffrey M. Spivak United States
Albert J. van der Veen Netherlands
James M. Morris United States
Robin Gc Israel
Bronek M. Boszczyk United Kingdom
T. S. Keller relative to M. Arand Germany M. Arand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
M. Arand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. S. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. S. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. S. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. S. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. S. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. S. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. S. Keller. The network helps show where T. S. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. S. Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. S. Keller Line = papers co-authored together T. S. Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001226
2 1987217
3 1990180
4 1987139
5 198665
6 200361
7
Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
199459
8 199256
9 200452
10 199352
11
In vivo creep behavior of the normal and degenerated porcine intervertebral disk: a preliminary report.
198849
12 199342
13 199437
14 199435
15 200334
16 199434
17 199232
18 200429
19 198528
20 199227

About T. S. Keller

T. S. Keller is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (8 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (4 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (395 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (583 citations), Pharmacology (405 citations), Surgery (525 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (414 citations). T. S. Keller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dan M. Spengler, Tommy Hansson, Zhongfa Mao, Christopher J. Hernandez, Gary S. Beaupré, Marek Szpalski, Tommy Hansson, P. Neumann, Kevin F. Spratt and Robert Gunzburg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, European Spine Journal, Spine and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact