Judith Lacey

1.2k citations
33 papers · 796 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Judith Lacey

29 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Judith Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Ophthalmology 127
  • Family Practice 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 360
  • General Health Professions 219
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 68
Replace P. Smits with:
P. Smits Netherlands
Deborah Fellowes United Kingdom
Idoia Gaminde Spain
Barbara Edelman Lewis United States
Sevgisun Kapucu Türkiye
Suzanne Ferrier Canada
Kirsti Toivonen Canada
Subramani Poongothai India
Desiree R. Azizoddin United States
Sandhya Ghai India
Judith Lacey relative to P. Smits Netherlands P. Smits's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.1×
P. Smits · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Lacey. The network helps show where Judith Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Lacey Line = papers co-authored together Judith Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007282
2 2008152
3 201854
4 202152
5 202137
6 200736
7 201834
8 201327
9 201822
10 201519
11 201914
12 20247
13 20217
14 20217
15 20227
16 20107
17 20246
18 20204
19 20244
20 20233

About Judith Lacey

Judith Lacey is a scholar working on Oncology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (15 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (127 citations), Family Practice (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (360 citations), General Health Professions (219 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (68 citations). Judith Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David C. Broadway, Hugo Ten Cate, Louise Elliott, Phyllis Butow, Rhonda Devine, David C. Currow, Katherine Clark, Judy M. Simpson, Ghauri Aggarwal and Martin H.N. Tattersall. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, BMJ Open, Psycho-Oncology, Integrative Cancer Therapies and The Cancer Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact