Ruth Webster
- Family Practice top 0.5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 29
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 13
-
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies 22
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 20
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 15
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 7
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 6
-
- European Union Policy and Governance 6
Ruth Webster
80 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Family Practice 337
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 172
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 685
- Economics and Econometrics 383
- General Health Professions 251
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Webster
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Webster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Webster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Webster. The network helps show where Ruth Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Webster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 18 | Are EU business associations governable | 2000 | 19 |
| 19 | What drives interest group collaboration at the EU level? Evidence from the European environmental interest groups | 2000 | 4 |
| 20 | Patients' and nurses' opinions about bathing. | 1988 | 4 |
About Ruth Webster
Ruth Webster is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (29 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (22 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (20 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (337 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (172 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (685 citations), Economics and Econometrics (383 citations) and General Health Professions (251 citations). Ruth Webster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Rodgers, Emma Heeley, Anushka Patel, David Peiris, José M. Castellano, Simon Thom, Oyere K. Onuma, Mark Woodward, Rohina Joshi and Alan Cass. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Global Heart, Journal of Hypertension, The Medical Journal of Australia and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.