Ruth Webster

3.8k total citations
81 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Ruth Webster is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Webster has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 32 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 29 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Ruth Webster's work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (29 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (22 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (20 papers). Ruth Webster is often cited by papers focused on Medication Adherence and Compliance (29 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (22 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (20 papers). Ruth Webster collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Ruth Webster's co-authors include Anthony Rodgers, Emma Heeley, Anushka Patel, David Peiris, José M. Castellano, Simon Thom, Oyere K. Onuma, Mark Woodward, Rohina Joshi and Alan Cass and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Webster

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Webster Australia 24 685 383 337 251 177 81 1.7k
José M. Castellano Spain 24 664 1.0× 300 0.8× 321 1.0× 108 0.4× 125 0.7× 70 1.8k
David Blackburn Canada 22 409 0.6× 377 1.0× 485 1.4× 166 0.7× 120 0.7× 80 1.9k
Jon-David Schwalm Canada 20 1.0k 1.5× 201 0.5× 152 0.5× 336 1.3× 281 1.6× 67 2.3k
Enrica Menditto Italy 23 320 0.5× 382 1.0× 542 1.6× 198 0.8× 117 0.7× 96 1.8k
Abdul Salam Australia 18 763 1.1× 192 0.5× 116 0.3× 143 0.6× 129 0.7× 80 1.5k
Jennifer Martin United States 20 293 0.4× 274 0.7× 303 0.9× 293 1.2× 169 1.0× 49 1.8k
Carla A. Sueta United States 23 1.9k 2.8× 293 0.8× 234 0.7× 466 1.9× 128 0.7× 64 2.8k
Sheila M. Manemann United States 25 1.5k 2.2× 208 0.5× 120 0.4× 308 1.2× 107 0.6× 61 2.5k
Kevin Mc Namara Australia 23 346 0.5× 223 0.6× 226 0.7× 569 2.3× 332 1.9× 119 2.0k
Filipa Alves da Costa Portugal 21 338 0.5× 214 0.6× 202 0.6× 182 0.7× 65 0.4× 108 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Webster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Webster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Webster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Webster. The network helps show where Ruth Webster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Webster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Webster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Webster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Webster. Ruth Webster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Kovoor, Joshua G., Clara K Chow, Abdul Salam, et al.. (2024). Participants’ views of ultra-low dose combination therapy for high blood pressure: a mixed-methods study from the QUARTET trial. Journal of Human Hypertension. 38(6). 516–522. 4 indexed citations
3.
Zhang, Jing, Pengpeng Ye, Minghui Yang, et al.. (2023). Development of a conceptual framework to scale up co-managed care for older patients with hip fracture in China: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). 898–898. 1 indexed citations
4.
Norman, Richard, Suzanne Robinson, Elin C. Lehnbom, et al.. (2022). Pharmacist’s time spent: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE (SPICE)—an observational time and motion study. BMJ Open. 12(3). e055597–e055597. 25 indexed citations
5.
Norman, Richard, Suzanne Robinson, Elin C. Lehnbom, et al.. (2020). Community pharmacist workflow: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE study protocol. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 28(5). 441–448. 3 indexed citations
6.
Orchard, J., Lis Neubeck, Ben Freedman, et al.. (2018). eHealth Tools to Provide Structured Assistance for Atrial Fibrillation Screening, Management, and Guideline‐Recommended Therapy in Metropolitan General Practice: The AF‐SMART Study. Journal of the American Heart Association. 8(1). e010959–e010959. 36 indexed citations
7.
Salam, Abdul, Ruth Webster, Anushka Patel, et al.. (2018). Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of a pharmacological strategy to improve hypertension control: protocol for a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 8(8). e022317–e022317. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bennett, Alexander, Clara K Chow, Michael F. Chou, et al.. (2017). Efficacy and Safety of Quarter-Dose Blood Pressure–Lowering Agents. Hypertension. 70(1). 85–93. 41 indexed citations
9.
Patel, Anushka & Ruth Webster. (2016). The potential and value of epidemiology in curbing non-communicable diseases. PubMed. 1. e15–e15. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hirakawa, Yoichiro, Hisatomi Arima, Ruth Webster, et al.. (2016). Risks associated with permanent discontinuation of blood pressure-lowering medications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Hypertension. 34(4). 781–787. 29 indexed citations
11.
Joshi, Rohina, Anushka Patel, David Peiris, et al.. (2015). INTegrated Electronic General practice support tool, phaRmacy led intervention And combination Therapy Evaluation trial (INTEGRATE). Heart Lung and Circulation. 24. S385–S385. 2 indexed citations
13.
Patel, Anushka, Séverine Bompoint, Alex Brown, et al.. (2015). The Effect of a Cardiovascular Polypill Strategy on Pill Burden. Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 33(6). 347–352. 24 indexed citations
14.
Webster, Ruth. (2014). The Single Pill to Avert Cardiovascular Events (SPACE) Collaboration: main results.. Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 4. 100087–100087. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lafeber, Melvin, et al.. (2011). The cardiovascular polypill in high-risk patients. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 19(6). 1234–1242. 20 indexed citations
16.
Webster, Ruth, et al.. (2010). Effects Of Internet-Based Tailored Advice on the Use of Cholesterol-Lowering Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 12(3). e42–e42. 12 indexed citations
17.
Webster, Ruth & Emma Heeley. (2010). Perceptions of risk: understanding cardiovascular disease. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 3. 49–49. 92 indexed citations
18.
Greenwood, Justin & Ruth Webster. (2000). Are EU business associations governable. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(4). 3. 19 indexed citations
19.
Webster, Ruth. (2000). What drives interest group collaboration at the EU level? Evidence from the European environmental interest groups. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4(4). 17. 4 indexed citations
20.
Webster, Ruth, et al.. (1988). Patients' and nurses' opinions about bathing.. PubMed. 84(37). 54–7. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026