Rhonda Devine

868 total citations
9 papers, 685 citations indexed

About

Rhonda Devine is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rhonda Devine has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 685 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rhonda Devine's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Rhonda Devine is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Rhonda Devine collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Belgium. Rhonda Devine's co-authors include Martin H.N. Tattersall, Phyllis Butow, Michael Boyer, Josephine M. Clayton, Judy M. Simpson, Katherine Clark, David C. Currow, Jesse Jansen, Judith Lacey and Ghauri Aggarwal and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Rhonda Devine

9 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rhonda Devine Australia 9 443 368 140 108 59 9 685
Helen Bunn Canada 7 559 1.3× 279 0.8× 87 0.6× 73 0.7× 29 0.5× 9 766
Julie B. Mallinger United States 11 261 0.6× 184 0.5× 195 1.4× 78 0.7× 78 1.3× 13 566
P. Venkatesh India 5 373 0.8× 221 0.6× 88 0.6× 39 0.4× 30 0.5× 9 578
Tara Schapmire United States 11 273 0.6× 348 0.9× 124 0.9× 90 0.8× 14 0.2× 29 516
Georgia Padonu United States 7 462 1.0× 256 0.7× 151 1.1× 75 0.7× 21 0.4× 8 773
Susan Galloway Canada 9 398 0.9× 200 0.5× 273 1.9× 74 0.7× 26 0.4× 14 680
Ingela Beck Sweden 13 223 0.5× 269 0.7× 150 1.1× 80 0.7× 41 0.7× 29 543
Hanna Bomhof‐Roordink Netherlands 8 394 0.9× 202 0.5× 42 0.3× 45 0.4× 55 0.9× 11 637
Anne Dahlhaus Germany 11 289 0.7× 141 0.4× 78 0.6× 47 0.4× 55 0.9× 22 811
Mary Anne Bright United States 14 338 0.8× 123 0.3× 189 1.4× 84 0.8× 17 0.3× 27 619

Countries citing papers authored by Rhonda Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhonda Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhonda Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhonda Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhonda Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhonda Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhonda Devine. The network helps show where Rhonda Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhonda Devine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhonda Devine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhonda Devine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhonda Devine. Rhonda Devine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Vardy, Janette L., Alexander Elder, Itay Keshet, et al.. (2022). On the receiving end: have patient perceptions of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy changed since the twentieth century?. Supportive Care in Cancer. 30(4). 3503–3512. 13 indexed citations
2.
Clayton, Josephine M., et al.. (2011). Physician endorsement alone may not enhance question-asking by advanced cancer patients during consultations about palliative care. Supportive Care in Cancer. 20(7). 1457–1464. 17 indexed citations
3.
Tattersall, Martin H.N., Rachel Dear, Jesse Jansen, et al.. (2009). Second opinions in oncology: the experiences of patients attending the Sydney Cancer Centre. The Medical Journal of Australia. 191(4). 209–212. 49 indexed citations
4.
Jansen, Jesse, Phyllis Butow, Julia C.M. van Weert, et al.. (2008). Does Age Really Matter? Recall of Information Presented to Newly Referred Patients With Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 26(33). 5450–5457. 135 indexed citations
5.
Clayton, Josephine M., Phyllis Butow, Martin H.N. Tattersall, et al.. (2007). Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prompt List to Help Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers to Ask Questions About Prognosis and End-of-Life Care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 25(6). 715–723. 282 indexed citations
6.
Butow, Phyllis, et al.. (2004). Cancer Consultation Preparation Package: Changing Patients but Not Physicians Is Not Enough. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 22(21). 4401–4409. 130 indexed citations
7.
Butow, Phyllis, et al.. (2002). Audiotapes of oncology consultations: only for the first consultation?. Annals of Oncology. 13(4). 622–627. 30 indexed citations
8.
Stuart‐Harris, R., R. John Simes, Alan S. Coates, et al.. (1987). Patient treatment preference in advanced breast cancer: A randomized cross-over study of doxorubicin and mitozantrone. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology. 23(5). 557–561. 11 indexed citations
9.
Crombie, Catherine, et al.. (1987). Phase II Study of Megestrol Acetate for Metastatic Carcinoma of the Prostate. British Journal of Urology. 59(5). 443–446. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026