J.S. Parker

1.6k total citations
18 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

J.S. Parker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, J.S. Parker has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in J.S. Parker's work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (7 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers). J.S. Parker is often cited by papers focused on RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (7 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers). J.S. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. J.S. Parker's co-authors include David Barford, S. Mark Roe, Nicholas J. Gay, Kenji Mizuguchi, Eneida Abreu Parizotto, Tom L. Blundell, Ralph Carmel, Zvi Kelman, E.D. Lowe and G. Bosman and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The EMBO Journal and Blood.

In The Last Decade

J.S. Parker

18 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.S. Parker United Kingdom	11	972	289	245	163	84	18	1.2k
Neema Agrawal India	9	1.2k 1.2×	149 0.5×	371 1.5×	129 0.8×	45 0.5×	14	1.5k
Igor Landais United States	15	434 0.4×	168 0.6×	47 0.2×	158 1.0×	37 0.4×	18	741
Dejan Bursać Australia	8	867 0.9×	86 0.3×	114 0.5×	162 1.0×	80 1.0×	19	1.2k
Leah R. Sabin United States	16	897 0.9×	373 1.3×	235 1.0×	360 2.2×	27 0.3×	20	1.4k
Matthew G. Seetin United States	12	1.1k 1.1×	114 0.4×	141 0.6×	50 0.3×	69 0.8×	12	1.3k
Philippe Valenti France	13	805 0.8×	114 0.4×	85 0.3×	298 1.8×	77 0.9×	18	1.4k
Priya Bellare United States	7	685 0.7×	267 0.9×	99 0.4×	104 0.6×	95 1.1×	8	1.1k
Keith N. Rand Australia	16	680 0.7×	113 0.4×	103 0.4×	81 0.5×	111 1.3×	23	960
Theresa L. Giesler United States	7	848 0.9×	131 0.5×	183 0.7×	33 0.2×	271 3.2×	9	1.2k
Olof Karlberg Sweden	13	613 0.6×	83 0.3×	120 0.5×	57 0.3×	98 1.2×	17	889

Countries citing papers authored by J.S. Parker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.S. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.S. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.S. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.S. Parker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.S. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.S. Parker. The network helps show where J.S. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.S. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.S. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.S. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.S. Parker. J.S. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Norton, Alice, J.S. Parker, Kevin Marsh, et al.. (2020). The remaining unknowns: a mixed methods study of the current and global health research priorities for COVID-19. BMJ Global Health. 5(7). e003306–e003306. 20 indexed citations

Hoang, Tuan, et al.. (2015). Role of Positively Charged Residues of the Second Transmembrane Domain in the Ion Transport Activity and Conformation of Human Uncoupling Protein-2. Biochemistry. 54(14). 2303–2313. 8 indexed citations

Sadler, David & J.S. Parker. (2014). Intra-individual and inter-individual variation in breath alcohol pharmacokinetics: The effect of short-term variation. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 25. 77–84. 5 indexed citations

Parizotto, Eneida Abreu, E.D. Lowe, & J.S. Parker. (2013). Structural basis for duplex RNA recognition and cleavage by Archaeoglobus fulgidus C3PO. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 20(3). 380–386. 14 indexed citations

Parker, J.S.. (2010). How to slice: snapshots of Argonaute in action. PubMed. 1(1). 3–3. 70 indexed citations

Carmel, Ralph, J.S. Parker, & Zvi Kelman. (2009). Genomic mutations associated with mild and severe deficiencies of transcobalamin I (haptocorrin) that cause mildly and severely low serum cobalamin levels. British Journal of Haematology. 147(3). 386–391. 20 indexed citations

Parker, J.S., et al.. (2009). Enhancement of the Seed-Target Recognition Step in RNA Silencing by a PIWI/MID Domain Protein. Molecular Cell. 33(2). 204–214. 116 indexed citations

Carmel, Ralph, J.S. Parker, & Zvi Kelman. (2009). Mutations of TCN1 Cause Transcobalamin I Deficiency with Low Serum Cobalamin Levels That Are Indistinguishable From Cobalamin Deficiency.. Blood. 114(22). 1989–1989. 2 indexed citations

Parker, J.S.. (2007). The generation of small RNAs; who needs Dicer?. PubMed. 3(1). 215–6. 1 indexed citations

10.

Parker, J.S., S. Mark Roe, & David Barford. (2006). Molecular Mechanism of Target RNA Transcript Recognition by Argonaute-Guide Complexes. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 71(0). 45–50. 25 indexed citations

11.

Parker, J.S. & David Barford. (2006). Argonaute: a scaffold for the function of short regulatory RNAs. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 31(11). 622–630. 126 indexed citations

12.

Parker, J.S., S. Mark Roe, & David Barford. (2005). Structural insights into mRNA recognition from a PIWI domain–siRNA guide complex. Nature. 434(7033). 663–666. 398 indexed citations

13.

Johnson, Andrew, et al.. (2005). Failure analysis of pixel shorting problems in polymer light emitting diode (PLED) displays. 19. 618–619. 1 indexed citations

14.

Parker, J.S., S. Mark Roe, & David Barford. (2004). Crystal structure of a PIWI protein suggests mechanisms for siRNA recognition and slicer activity. The EMBO Journal. 23(24). 4727–4737. 265 indexed citations

15.

Parker, J.S., Kenji Mizuguchi, & Nicholas J. Gay. (2001). A family of proteins related to Spätzle, the toll receptor ligand, are encoded in the Drosophila genome. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics. 45(1). 71–80. 70 indexed citations

16.

Gay, N, Kenji Mizuguchi, & J.S. Parker. (2001). A family of proteins related to spatzle, the Tol receptor ligand are encoded in the Drosophila genome. Biochemical Society Transactions. 29(5). A126–A126. 1 indexed citations

17.

Mizuguchi, Kenji, J.S. Parker, Tom L. Blundell, & Nicholas J. Gay. (1998). Getting knotted: a model for the structure and activation of Spätzle. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 23(7). 239–242. 91 indexed citations

18.

Parker, J.S. & G. Bosman. (1992). Noise characterization of an AlGaAs interdigitated metal-semiconductor-metal photodetector (MSM-PD). IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 39(6). 1282–1287. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact