Joya Pawade

39 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Joya Pawade
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 160
  • Genetics 76
  • Dermatology 50
  • Oncology 120
  • Cancer Research 59
Replace Thera A.M. Wormhoudt with:
Thera A.M. Wormhoudt Netherlands
Juehua Gao United States
Elizabeth Rigney Ireland
Ginette Schiby Israel
S. Saks United States
Iwao Nakayama Japan
Cosmin Tegla United States
Susanne Timshel Denmark
Benjamin E. Rich United States
Daniela Boselli Italy
Joya Pawade relative to Thera A.M. Wormhoudt Netherlands Thera A.M. Wormhoudt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thera A.M. Wormhoudt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joya Pawade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joya Pawade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joya Pawade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joya Pawade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joya Pawade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joya Pawade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joya Pawade. The network helps show where Joya Pawade may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joya Pawade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joya Pawade Line = papers co-authored together Joya Pawade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011162
2 199363
3 200444
4 201740
5 199333
6 199533
7 201231
8 200330
9
Overexpression of the TXNDC5 protein in non-small cell lung carcinoma.
201130
10 201428
11 200728
12 200727
13 201427
14 200624
15 199424
16 200622
17 200013
18 199011
19 20219
20 20058

About Joya Pawade

Joya Pawade is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (5 papers), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (4 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (4 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers) and Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (160 citations), Genetics (76 citations), Dermatology (50 citations), Oncology (120 citations) and Cancer Research (59 citations). Joya Pawade has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Margaret May, Jeremy M. Tavaré, Douglas J.E. Elder, Emma E. Vincent, Carys Morgan, J. Rode, Muhammad Sohail, M Hetzel, Elaine Thomas and M C Parkinson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Eye, British Journal of Cancer, Biology of Reproduction and Histopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact