Josh Siepel

543 total citations
19 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Josh Siepel is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Josh Siepel has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Josh Siepel's work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). Josh Siepel is often cited by papers focused on Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). Josh Siepel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Netherlands. Josh Siepel's co-authors include Marc Cowling, Alex Coad, Paul Nightingale, Michael M. Hopkins, Antonio Perianes‐Rodríguez, Alice O’Hare, Ismael Ràfols, Jarno Hoekman, Marcus Dejardin and Dmitry Malkov and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Small Business Economics and Technovation.

In The Last Decade

Josh Siepel

19 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Josh Siepel United Kingdom	10	169	114	104	89	34	19	363
Kenneth Younge United States	7	187 1.1×	156 1.4×	86 0.8×	100 1.1×	20 0.6×	14	341
Salih Zeki Ozdemir Australia	6	132 0.8×	163 1.4×	122 1.2×	239 2.7×	62 1.8×	15	429
Sadao Nagaoka Japan	13	230 1.4×	185 1.6×	102 1.0×	208 2.3×	11 0.3×	39	448
Daniela Baglieri Italy	11	107 0.6×	172 1.5×	39 0.4×	169 1.9×	29 0.9×	23	344
Neus Palomeras Spain	8	405 2.4×	330 2.9×	116 1.1×	272 3.1×	19 0.6×	12	623
Christos Kolympiris United States	12	283 1.7×	235 2.1×	227 2.2×	107 1.2×	20 0.6×	25	509
Gavin Clarkson United States	7	85 0.5×	71 0.6×	40 0.4×	85 1.0×	8 0.2×	22	281
Raffaele Conti Portugal	14	200 1.2×	180 1.6×	142 1.4×	223 2.5×	39 1.1×	30	468
Maria Isabella Leone Italy	9	269 1.6×	216 1.9×	86 0.8×	253 2.8×	14 0.4×	23	460
Nikolas Zolas United States	11	290 1.7×	106 0.9×	54 0.5×	95 1.1×	6 0.2×	22	459

Countries citing papers authored by Josh Siepel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Siepel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Siepel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Siepel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Siepel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Siepel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Siepel. The network helps show where Josh Siepel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josh Siepel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josh Siepel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josh Siepel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josh Siepel. Josh Siepel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Siepel, Josh, et al.. (2023). Determinants of rural creative microclustering: Evidence from web‐scraped data for England. Papers of the Regional Science Association. 102(5). 903–944. 4 indexed citations

Yaqub, Ohid, Dmitry Malkov, & Josh Siepel. (2023). How unpredictable is research impact? Evidence from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework. Research Evaluation. 32(2). 273–285. 3 indexed citations

Malkov, Dmitry, Ohid Yaqub, & Josh Siepel. (2023). The spread of retracted research into policy literature. Quantitative Science Studies. 4(1). 68–90. 10 indexed citations

Siepel, Josh, et al.. (2023). Mapping the state of the art of creative cluster research: a bibliometric and thematic analysis. European Planning Studies. 31(12). 2531–2551. 14 indexed citations

Fazio, Giorgio, et al.. (2022). Starving the golden goose? Access to finance for innovators in the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics. 46(2). 345–386. 2 indexed citations

Siepel, Josh, et al.. (2021). Creative Radar 2021: the impact of COVID-19 on the UK's creative industries. Figshare. 5 indexed citations

Siepel, Josh & Marcus Dejardin. (2020). How do we measure firm performance? A review of issues facing entrepreneurship researchers. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. 19 indexed citations

Siepel, Josh, et al.. (2019). Skills combinations and firm performance. Small Business Economics. 56(4). 1425–1447. 21 indexed citations

Noh, Heeyong, et al.. (2018). What factors of early‐stage innovative projects are likely to drive projects’ success? A longitudinal analysis of Korean entrepreneurial firms. R and D Management. 48(5). 627–640. 4 indexed citations

10.

Coad, Alex, Marc Cowling, & Josh Siepel. (2016). Growth processes of high-growth firms as a four-dimensional chicken and egg. Industrial and Corporate Change. 26(4). 537–554. 46 indexed citations

11.

Siepel, Josh, Marc Cowling, & Alex Coad. (2016). Non-founder human capital and the long-run growth and survival of high-tech ventures. Technovation. 59. 34–43. 52 indexed citations

12.

Siepel, Josh, et al.. (2016). The fusion effect: the economic returns to combining arts and science skills. Figshare. 8 indexed citations

13.

Cowling, Marc, Josh Siepel, Weixi Liu, & Gordon Murray. (2014). ARE HIGHLY INNOVATIVE FIRMS ALSO HIGH GROWTH FIRMS? AND WHAT ARE THE CAUSAL EVENTS THAT DELIVER HIGH SALES GROWTH? (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 34(14). 7. 2 indexed citations

14.

Coad, Alex, Marc Cowling, Paul Nightingale, et al.. (2014). Innovative firms and growth: UK Innovation Survey. 2 indexed citations

15.

Hopkins, Michael M. & Josh Siepel. (2013). Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better)?. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 25(6). 655–685. 16 indexed citations

16.

Ràfols, Ismael, Michael M. Hopkins, Jarno Hoekman, et al.. (2012). Big Pharma, little science?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 81. 22–38. 103 indexed citations

17.

Ràfols, Ismael, Jarno Hoekman, Josh Siepel, et al.. (2012). Big Pharma, Little Science? A Bibliometric Perspective on Big Pharma’s R&D Decline. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

18.

Cowling, Marc & Josh Siepel. (2012). Public intervention in UK small firm credit markets: Value-for-money or waste of scarce resources?. Technovation. 33(8-9). 265–275. 27 indexed citations

19.

Siepel, Josh & Paul Nightingale. (2012). Anglo-Saxon governance: Similarities, difference and outcomes in a financialised world. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 25(1). 27–35. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact