Joseph L. Demer
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.05%
- Ophthalmology top 0.1%
- Neurology top 0.1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Robert A. ClarkJoel M. MillerVadims PoukensBenjamin T. CraneArthur L. RosenbaumReika KonoFederico G. VelezChaudhuri Zia
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (256 papers)Vestibular and auditory disorders (108 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (99 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Joseph L. Demer
344 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 6.0k
- Ophthalmology 3.1k
- Neurology 3.0k
- Neurology 2.0k
- Epidemiology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph L. Demer
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph L. Demer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph L. Demer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph L. Demer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph L. Demer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph L. Demer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph L. Demer. The network helps show where Joseph L. Demer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph L. Demer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph L. Demer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph L. Demer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph L. Demer. Joseph L. Demer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Anatomical Factors Exaggerating Optic Nerve (ON) Strain During Adduction Tethering in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) Without Elevated Intraocular Pressure (IOP). | 1 |
| 11 | Sensitivity of mechanical strain in human peripapillary region to adduction tethering evaluated by hyperelastic characterization and finite element analysis (FEA) | 1 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | Generalized Ocular Counter-Rolling (OCR): Whole Body Roll Induces Large and Persistent Changes in Offset and Orientation of Listing’s Plane (LP) | 0 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Refractive Error and Eye Shape by MRI | 4 |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 184 |
About Joseph L. Demer
Joseph L. Demer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology and Neurology, having authored 359 papers that have together received 9.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (256 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (108 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (99 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (3.0k citations), Ophthalmology (3.1k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (6.0k citations). Joseph L. Demer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Clark, Joel M. Miller, Vadims Poukens, Benjamin T. Crane, Arthur L. Rosenbaum, Reika Kono, Federico G. Velez, Chaudhuri Zia, Junru Tian and Stacy L. Pineles. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.