Federico G. Velez
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 31
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 13
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 13
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 86
- Neurology top 2%
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis 15
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 10
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 31
- Anatomy top 1%
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 26
- Co-authors
- Stacy L. PinelesArthur L. RosenbaumJoseph L. DemerNeepa ThackerRobert A. ClarkRoger S. FosterSherwin J. IsenbergMichelle T. Britt
- Journals
- Ophthalmology (3 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (11 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombiaItaly
In The Last Decade
Federico G. Velez
125 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Ophthalmology 820
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.2k
- Neurology 446
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 322
- Anatomy 27
Countries citing papers authored by Federico G. Velez
This map shows the geographic impact of Federico G. Velez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico G. Velez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico G. Velez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federico G. Velez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico G. Velez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico G. Velez. The network helps show where Federico G. Velez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federico G. Velez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 5 | QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF NORMAL IRIS VASCULAR DENSITY USING ANTERIOR SEGMENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY | 2018 | 1 |
| 6 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 81 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 18 |
About Federico G. Velez
Federico G. Velez is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 136 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (86 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (31 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (31 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (26 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (13 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (820 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.2k citations) and Neurology (446 citations). Federico G. Velez has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stacy L. Pineles, Arthur L. Rosenbaum, Joseph L. Demer, Neepa Thacker, Robert A. Clark, Roger S. Foster, Sherwin J. Isenberg, Michelle T. Britt, Irena Tsui and David Sarraf. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.