Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Mïller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Mïller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Mïller more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Mïller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Mïller. The network helps show where J. M. Mïller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Mïller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Mïller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Mïller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Mïller. J. M. Mïller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strohmayer, Tod E., D. Altamirano, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2019). <i>NICER</i> Discovers Spectral Lines during Photospheric Radius Expansion Bursts from 4U 1820−30: Evidence for Burst-driven Winds. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).4 indexed citations
Mïller, J. M., M. T. Reynolds, Steven E. Boggs, et al.. (2016). NuSTAR observations of the black holes GS 1354-645: Evidence of rapid black hole spin. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).21 indexed citations
12.
Sleator, Clio, John A. Tomsick, Ashley L. King, et al.. (2016). A <i>NuSTAR </i>observation of the reflection spectrum of the low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1728-34. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).10 indexed citations
13.
Zoghbi, Abderahmen, J. M. Mïller, D. J. Walton, et al.. (2015). <i>NuSTAR </i>Reveals Relativistic Reflection but no Ultra-fast Outflow in the Quasar PG1211+143. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).24 indexed citations
14.
Reynolds, C. S., A. Lohfink, Patrick Ogle, et al.. (2015). <i>NuSTAR </i>Observations of the Powerful Radio-Galaxy Cygnus A. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).18 indexed citations
15.
Nowak, Michael A., Joey Neilsen, Sera Markoff, et al.. (2012). UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).61 indexed citations
Salvesen, Greg, J. M. Mïller, Edward M. Cackett, & Aneta Siemiginowska. (2009). A Deep <em>XMM-Newton</em> Observation of the Quasar 3C 287. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University).2 indexed citations
18.
Mïller, J. M., Edward M. Cackett, K. Yamaoka, et al.. (2009). <em>Suzaku</em> Observations of the Black Hole H1743-322 in Outburst. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University).10 indexed citations
19.
Barret, D., A. A. Zdziarski, J. Wilms, et al.. (2008). Science with the XEUS High Time Resolution Spectrometer. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.