Joseph Kei

2.7k total citations
125 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Joseph Kei is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph Kei has authored 125 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 89 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 85 papers in Sensory Systems and 69 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Joseph Kei's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (87 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (85 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (69 papers). Joseph Kei is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (87 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (85 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (69 papers). Joseph Kei collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Japan. Joseph Kei's co-authors include Carlie Driscoll, Bradley McPherson, Veronica Smyth, Sreedevi Aithal, Asaduzzaman Khan, Rafidah Mazlan, Rachael Beswick, Bruce E. Murdoch, Helen J. Chenery and Catharine Pettigrew and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Joseph Kei

117 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph Kei Australia 24 1.1k 1.0k 864 210 200 125 1.6k
Judith E. Widen United States 22 1.2k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 471 0.5× 149 0.7× 301 1.5× 35 1.6k
Richard C. Folsom United States 23 1.3k 1.2× 1.3k 1.2× 439 0.5× 162 0.8× 122 0.6× 40 1.7k
Beth A. Prieve United States 24 1.2k 1.1× 1.3k 1.2× 607 0.7× 324 1.5× 101 0.5× 45 1.5k
M. Patrick Feeney United States 25 1.4k 1.2× 1.3k 1.2× 772 0.9× 480 2.3× 53 0.3× 65 2.0k
Albert L. Mehl United States 5 1.5k 1.4× 1.5k 1.5× 547 0.6× 152 0.7× 590 3.0× 6 2.2k
Susan J. Norton United States 28 2.0k 1.8× 1.9k 1.9× 467 0.5× 515 2.5× 138 0.7× 64 2.5k
Anne Marie Tharpe United States 22 1.8k 1.7× 1.1k 1.0× 383 0.4× 140 0.7× 755 3.8× 73 2.2k
Marion P. Downs United States 19 674 0.6× 550 0.5× 389 0.5× 74 0.4× 314 1.6× 55 1.4k
Gijsbert A. van Zanten Netherlands 24 1.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 257 0.3× 282 1.3× 93 0.5× 72 1.5k
Patricia Roush United States 22 1.5k 1.4× 1.2k 1.2× 258 0.3× 231 1.1× 404 2.0× 39 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Kei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Kei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Kei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Kei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Kei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Kei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Kei. The network helps show where Joseph Kei may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Kei

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Kei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Kei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Kei. Joseph Kei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kei, Joseph, et al.. (2025). Associated factors for parent-reported otitis media in 12-month-old infants. International Journal of Audiology. 1–6.
2.
Beswick, Rachael, et al.. (2024). Otolaryngology outcomes of infants with conductive hearing loss identified through universal newborn hearing screening. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 181. 111970–111970.
3.
Beswick, Rachael, et al.. (2023). Conductive hearing loss in newborns: Hearing profile, risk factors, and occasions of service. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 171. 111630–111630. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kei, Joseph, et al.. (2022). Measuring resonance frequency of the middle ear in school-aged children: potential applications for detecting middle ear dysfunction. International Journal of Audiology. 62(11). 1076–1083. 1 indexed citations
5.
Aithal, Sreedevi, et al.. (2022). High frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry in six-month-old infants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 160. 111223–111223. 2 indexed citations
6.
Aithal, Sreedevi, et al.. (2018). Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Wideband Absorbance Measurements at Tympanometric Peak Pressure and 0 daPa. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 30(9). 781–791. 12 indexed citations
7.
Aithal, Sreedevi, et al.. (2017). Effect of ear canal pressure and age on wideband absorbance in young infants. International Journal of Audiology. 56(5). 346–355. 7 indexed citations
8.
Feeney, M. Patrick, Lisa L. Hunter, Joseph Kei, et al.. (2013). Consensus Statement. Ear and Hearing. 34(Supplement 1). 78s–79s. 44 indexed citations
9.
Henry, Belinda A., et al.. (2013). Measuring speech perception abilities in adults with cochlear implants: Comprehension versus speech recognition. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 33(1). 35–47. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kei, Joseph, Chris A. Sanford, Beth A. Prieve, & Lisa L. Hunter. (2013). Wideband Acoustic Immittance Measures. Ear and Hearing. 34(Supplement 1). 17s–26s. 22 indexed citations
11.
Beswick, Rachael, et al.. (2012). Targeted surveillance for postnatal hearing loss: A program evaluation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 76(7). 1046–1056. 29 indexed citations
12.
Kei, Joseph, et al.. (2012). High frequency tympanometry findings in neonates: Does it depend on head position?. International Journal of Audiology. 51(6). 475–479. 1 indexed citations
13.
Kei, Joseph, et al.. (2005). Measuring the Ability of School Children with a History of Otitis Media to Understand Everyday Speech. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 16(5). 301–311. 11 indexed citations
14.
Pettigrew, Catharine, Bruce E. Murdoch, Curtis W. Ponton, et al.. (2004). Automatic Auditory Processing of English Words as Indexed by the Mismatch Negativity, Using a Multiple Deviant Paradigm. Ear and Hearing. 25(3). 284–301. 62 indexed citations
15.
Pettigrew, Catharine, Bruce E. Murdoch, Curtis W. Ponton, et al.. (2004). Subtitled Videos and Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Investigations of Spoken Word Processing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 15(7). 469–485. 32 indexed citations
16.
Driscoll, Carlie, et al.. (2002). Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children studying in special schools. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 64(1). 51–60. 11 indexed citations
17.
Kei, Joseph, et al.. (2001). The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants. British Journal of Audiology. 35(1). 67–85. 5 indexed citations
19.
Smyth, Veronica, et al.. (1998). Infant hearing screening: a comparison of two techniques. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 22(2). 261–265. 2 indexed citations
20.
Kei, Joseph & Veronica Smyth. (1997). Measuring the ability of hearing impaired children to understand connected discourse: A comparison of two methods. British Journal of Audiology. 31(4). 283–297. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026