M. Patrick Feeney

64 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

M. Patrick Feeney
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Sensory Systems 1.3k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 772
  • Speech and Hearing 487
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Neurology 480
Replace Susan J. Norton with:
Susan J. Norton United States
Denis Fitzpatrick United States
Richard C. Folsom United States
Gijsbert A. van Zanten Netherlands
Joseph Kei Australia
Carolina Abdala United States
Beth A. Prieve United States
Christopher F. Halpin United States
Judith E. Widen United States
Martin Walger Germany
M. Patrick Feeney relative to Susan J. Norton United States Susan J. Norton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Susan J. Norton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Patrick Feeney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Patrick Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Patrick Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Patrick Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Patrick Feeney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Patrick Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Patrick Feeney. The network helps show where M. Patrick Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Patrick Feeney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Patrick Feeney Line = papers co-authored together M. Patrick Feeney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011191
2 2003134
3 2008132
4 2010117
5 200479
6 201079
7 201677
8 201770
9 200169
10 200862
11 199961
12 200857
13 200355
14 201346
15 201344
16 201341
17 201539
18 200937
19 201637
20 201335

About M. Patrick Feeney

M. Patrick Feeney is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing and Neurology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (50 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (46 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (27 papers), Noise Effects and Management (15 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (13 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (4 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (3 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.3k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (772 citations), Speech and Hearing (487 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations) and Neurology (480 citations). M. Patrick Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas H. Keefe, George A. Gates, Chris A. Sanford, Lisa L. Hunter, Susan M. McCurry, Eric B. Larson, Melissa L. Anderson, Denis Fitzpatrick, David M. Mills and Kim S. Schairer. Their work appears in journals such as Ear and Hearing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and American Journal of Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact