Joseph J. Hobbs

38 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Joseph J. Hobbs
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Sociology and Political Science 109
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 101
  • Molecular Biology 62
  • Ecology 59
  • General Health Professions 54
Replace Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo with:
Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo United Kingdom
Dawn Chatty United Kingdom
L. J. Gorenflo United States
Thomas E. Sheridan United States
Alison A. Ormsby United States
Robert E. Rhoades United States
Dee Williams United States
Rui Sérgio Sereni Murrieta Brazil
Peggy F. Barlett United States
Reed L. Wadley United States
Joseph J. Hobbs relative to Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo United Kingdom Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph J. Hobbs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph J. Hobbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph J. Hobbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph J. Hobbs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph J. Hobbs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph J. Hobbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph J. Hobbs. The network helps show where Joseph J. Hobbs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph J. Hobbs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph J. Hobbs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph J. Hobbs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph J. Hobbs. Joseph J. Hobbs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 4
4 1
5 3
6 4
7 12
8
Evaluating perceptions of community-based physicians from a high-retention clerkship.
4
9
Egypt: An Economic Geography
24
10 2
11 5
12
The invisible faculty.
34
13 1
14
Leopard-Hunting Scenes in Dated Rock Paintings From the Northern Eastern Desert of Egypt
2
15 13
16
Publication productivity in academic family medicine departments.
8
17 3
18 30
19 30
20
A system for assessing clerkship experience using a logbook and microcomputers.
17

About Joseph J. Hobbs

Joseph J. Hobbs is a scholar working on Archeology, Geography, Planning and Development and Anthropology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (101 citations), Forestry (28 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations). Joseph J. Hobbs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David Johnson, John G. Galaty, Steven M. Goodman, Richard H. Pierce, Michael A. W. Hattwick, Werner Lange, Christopher L. Salter, John D. Grainger, Ralph A. Gillies and M. A. Zahran. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Biodiversity and Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026