Joseph C. Pitt

167 total papers · 1.5k total citations
47 papers, 464 citations indexed

About

Joseph C. Pitt is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph C. Pitt has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 464 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Joseph C. Pitt's work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (4 papers). Joseph C. Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (4 papers). Joseph C. Pitt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Joseph C. Pitt's co-authors include Robert E. Butts, Edmund F. Byrne, Lawrence Ang, Yvonne Breyer, Laurence Goldstein, Djavad Salehi‐Isfahani, Frederick Suppe, Carl E. Zipper, Jaime Nubiola and Deborah G. Mayo and has published in prestigious journals such as Studies in Higher Education, Technology in Society and The Philosophical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Joseph C. Pitt

37 papers receiving 381 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Joseph C. Pitt 165 78 64 63 54 47 464
Friedrich Steinle 309 1.9× 53 0.7× 62 1.0× 49 0.8× 41 0.8× 40 550
Willem Hackmann 271 1.6× 64 0.8× 40 0.6× 41 0.7× 29 0.5× 28 547
Werner Callebaut 148 0.9× 112 1.4× 48 0.8× 24 0.4× 19 0.4× 32 521
Erik Weber 248 1.5× 95 1.2× 47 0.7× 104 1.7× 12 0.2× 75 487
Matthew J. Brown 136 0.8× 180 2.3× 60 0.9× 113 1.8× 37 0.7× 41 428
William Warren Bartley 131 0.8× 95 1.2× 40 0.6× 91 1.4× 32 0.6× 26 532
Thomas Sturm 157 1.0× 75 1.0× 89 1.4× 124 2.0× 17 0.3× 45 523
Fred D’Agostino 64 0.4× 220 2.8× 41 0.6× 100 1.6× 30 0.6× 56 477
Kristina Rolin 109 0.7× 248 3.2× 36 0.6× 129 2.0× 35 0.6× 36 433
Joseph E. Harmon 78 0.5× 73 0.9× 17 0.3× 56 0.9× 39 0.7× 19 447

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Pitt. The network helps show where Joseph C. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. Pitt. Joseph C. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026