Matthew J. Clement

657 total citations
29 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Matthew J. Clement is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew J. Clement has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Ecology, 14 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 6 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Matthew J. Clement's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (17 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (13 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers). Matthew J. Clement is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (17 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (13 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers). Matthew J. Clement collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Matthew J. Clement's co-authors include Steven B. Castleberry, James D. Nichols, Jagmeet S. Kanwal, J. Andrew Royle, Joseph M. Szewczak, Patricia C. Ormsbee, Thomas J. Rodhouse, Sarah J. Converse, James E. Hines and Larisa E. Harding and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Global Change Biology and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Matthew J. Clement

28 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Matthew J. Clement
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ecology 267
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
  • Ecological Modeling 129
  • Developmental Biology 78
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 77
Replace Henry Schofield with:
Henry Schofield United Kingdom
Gunnar R. Kramer United States
Nathan W. Cooper United States
Anne K. Scharf Germany
A. Zubaid Malaysia
Patricia C. Ormsbee United States
Ya‐Fu Lee Taiwan
Arseny Tsvey Russia
Ville Vasko Finland
Jesús Molinari Venezuela
Henry Schofield United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Matthew J. Clement
Matthew J. Clement · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Matthew J. Clement
Matthew J. Clement · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew J. Clement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew J. Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew J. Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew J. Clement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew J. Clement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew J. Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew J. Clement. The network helps show where Matthew J. Clement may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew J. Clement

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew J. Clement. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew J. Clement based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew J. Clement. Matthew J. Clement is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 1
4 10
5 2
6 1
7 1
8 15
9 3
10 11
11 21
12 5
13 25
14 27
15 3
16 49
17 27
18 20
19 28
20 27

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026