This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Genome. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Genome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genome more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Genome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Genome.
About Genome
The 4.9k papers published in Genome in the last decades have received a total of 145.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Genome usually cover Plant Science (2.4k papers), Genetics (705 papers), Aging (10 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (110 papers) and Molecular Biology (398 papers) specifically the topics of Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1.3k papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (702 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (338 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (165 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (67 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (52 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (46 papers) and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Genome are Bikram Singh Gill, Anthony H. D. Brown, Mark E. Sorrells, Gurdev Singh Khush, Derek J. Lydiate, Steve D. Tanksley, Jiming Jiang, John Seymour Heslop-Harrison, Richard R.‐C. Wang and Jan Dvořák.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.