Jonathan Stone

443 total citations
8 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Stone is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Stone has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Neurology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Stone's work include Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers). Jonathan Stone is often cited by papers focused on Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers). Jonathan Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Jonathan Stone's co-authors include Howard J. Silberstein, Corey T. Walker, Curtis J. Rozzelle, Thomas Gruber, Minal Jain, Matthew R. Reynolds, Eric C. Leuthardt, Yan Li, Marek Czosnyka and Wesley Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics and World Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Stone

8 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jonathan Stone United States	7	222	124	124	100	36	8	299
Saba Jafarpour United States	10	73 0.3×	38 0.3×	140 1.1×	31 0.3×	21 0.6×	33	384
Nadia Shihab United Kingdom	12	98 0.4×	21 0.2×	116 0.9×	29 0.3×	62 1.7×	21	359
J L Iddon United Kingdom	7	237 1.1×	140 1.1×	128 1.0×	122 1.2×	16 0.4×	8	321
Rinat Jonas United States	8	109 0.5×	40 0.3×	341 2.8×	20 0.2×	25 0.7×	22	584
Chong-Tin Tan Malaysia	11	28 0.1×	63 0.5×	113 0.9×	23 0.2×	8 0.2×	33	325
William B. Lo United Kingdom	10	41 0.2×	58 0.5×	32 0.3×	43 0.4×	72 2.0×	44	225
Laurence Glancz United Kingdom	7	234 1.1×	275 2.2×	142 1.1×	88 0.9×	92 2.6×	16	476
C Thauvoy Belgium	9	107 0.5×	151 1.2×	71 0.6×	23 0.2×	127 3.5×	26	307
Ilse J.M. Nijhuis Netherlands	9	40 0.2×	79 0.6×	272 2.2×	45 0.5×	10 0.3×	10	388
Yu-tze Ng United States	8	96 0.4×	44 0.4×	152 1.2×	9 0.1×	55 1.5×	12	375

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Stone

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Stone

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Stone. The network helps show where Jonathan Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Stone. Jonathan Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

O’Rourke, Michael F., Jonathan Stone, Audrey Adji, et al.. (2020). The Human Systemic and Cerebral Circulations: Contrasts in Structure and Function. Artery Research. 26(4). 197–211. 6 indexed citations

2.

Garcea, Frank E., Bram R. Diamond, Wesley Lewis, et al.. (2017). Direct Electrical Stimulation in the Human Brain Disrupts Melody Processing. Current Biology. 27(17). 2684–2691.e7. 22 indexed citations

3.

Walker, Corey T., et al.. (2013). The effects of socioeconomic status and race on pediatric neurosurgical shunting. Child s Nervous System. 30(1). 117–122. 21 indexed citations

4.

Walker, Corey T., et al.. (2012). Indications for Pediatric External Ventricular Drain Placement and Risk Factors for Conversion to a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 48(6). 342–347. 17 indexed citations

5.

Stone, Jonathan, et al.. (2012). Revision rate of pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts after 15 years. Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics. 11(1). 15–19. 203 indexed citations

6.

Stone, Jonathan, Matthew R. Reynolds, & Eric C. Leuthardt. (2011). Transient Hemispatial Neglect After Surgical Resection of a Right Frontal Lobe Mass. World Neurosurgery. 76(3-4). 361.e7–361.e10. 9 indexed citations

7.

Stone, Jonathan, Thomas Gruber, & Curtis J. Rozzelle. (2010). Healthcare Savings Associated with Reduced Infection Rates Using Antimicrobial Suture Wound Closure for Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Procedures. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 46(1). 19–24. 20 indexed citations

8.

Fite, Katherine V., et al.. (1983). Subject Index Vol. 22, 1983. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 22(4). 224–224. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact