Jonathan Redshaw

1.8k total citations
58 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Redshaw is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Redshaw has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 20 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Redshaw's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (42 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Jonathan Redshaw is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (42 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Jonathan Redshaw collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Africa. Jonathan Redshaw's co-authors include Thomas Suddendorf, Mark Nielsen, Adam Bulley, Jacqueline Davis, Virginia Slaughter, Janine Oostenbroek, Siobhan Kennedy‐Costantini, Matti Wilks, Sam J. Gilbert and Alex H. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Child Development and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Redshaw

56 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Redshaw Australia 18 613 449 347 255 117 58 1.0k
Christoph Hoerl United Kingdom 19 449 0.7× 597 1.3× 294 0.8× 380 1.5× 93 0.8× 60 1.2k
Sabina Pauen Germany 22 821 1.3× 446 1.0× 466 1.3× 241 0.9× 173 1.5× 98 1.3k
Ernő Téglás Austria 12 958 1.6× 457 1.0× 455 1.3× 210 0.8× 100 0.9× 15 1.4k
Lori Markson United States 17 1.1k 1.8× 357 0.8× 312 0.9× 295 1.2× 161 1.4× 43 1.5k
Ágnes Melinda Kovács Hungary 16 1.3k 2.2× 838 1.9× 474 1.4× 354 1.4× 101 0.9× 51 1.9k
Gert Westermann United Kingdom 20 934 1.5× 646 1.4× 297 0.9× 430 1.7× 148 1.3× 90 1.6k
Suzanne Hala Canada 13 1.1k 1.8× 653 1.5× 522 1.5× 178 0.7× 208 1.8× 27 1.4k
Merideth Gattis United Kingdom 19 908 1.5× 694 1.5× 993 2.9× 308 1.2× 154 1.3× 49 1.6k
Caitlin M. Fausey United States 13 407 0.7× 374 0.8× 212 0.6× 316 1.2× 66 0.6× 29 988
Ken Springer United States 18 724 1.2× 374 0.8× 414 1.2× 208 0.8× 301 2.6× 28 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Redshaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Redshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Redshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Redshaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Redshaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Redshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Redshaw. The network helps show where Jonathan Redshaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Redshaw

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Redshaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Redshaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Redshaw. Jonathan Redshaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Redshaw, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). A key to innovation: When do children begin to recognize and manufacture solutions to future problems?. Developmental Psychology. 62(3). 532–543. 1 indexed citations
2.
Redshaw, Jonathan. (2024). The recursive grammar of mental time travel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 379(1913). 20230412–20230412. 1 indexed citations
3.
Redshaw, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). Can you help me? Using others to offload cognition. Memory & Cognition. 53(3). 946–959. 2 indexed citations
4.
Redshaw, Jonathan & Thomas Suddendorf. (2024). Can chimpanzees conceive of mutually exclusive future possibilities? A Comment on: ‘Chimpanzees prepare for alternative possible outcomes’ (2023), by Engelmann et al.. Biology Letters. 20(6). 20230409–20230409. 3 indexed citations
5.
Suddendorf, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Counterfactual choices and moral judgments in children. Child Development. 94(5). e296–e307. 6 indexed citations
6.
Redshaw, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). What are the odds? Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish between possible, impossible, and probabilistically distinct future outcomes.. Developmental Psychology. 59(10). 1881–1891. 3 indexed citations
7.
Suddendorf, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Creativity and flexibility in young children's use of external cognitive strategies.. Developmental Psychology. 59(6). 995–1005. 7 indexed citations
8.
Redshaw, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). Young children experience both regret and relief in a gain-or-loss context. Cognition & Emotion. 38(1). 163–170. 2 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Jacqueline, Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf, et al.. (2021). Does Neonatal Imitation Exist? Insights From a Meta-Analysis of 336 Effect Sizes. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 16(6). 1373–1397. 28 indexed citations
10.
Henry, Julie D., et al.. (2021). An old problem revisited: How sensitive is time-based prospective memory to age-related differences?. Psychology and Aging. 36(5). 616–625. 2 indexed citations
11.
Suddendorf, Thomas, et al.. (2020). It's in the bag: mobile containers in human evolution and child development. Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2. e48–e48. 9 indexed citations
12.
Bulley, Adam, et al.. (2020). Children Devise and Selectively Use Tools to Offload Cognition. Current Biology. 30(17). 3457–3464.e3. 31 indexed citations
13.
Redshaw, Jonathan, Mark Nielsen, Virginia Slaughter, et al.. (2019). Individual differences in neonatal “imitation” fail to predict early social cognitive behaviour. Developmental Science. 23(2). e12892–e12892. 9 indexed citations
14.
Carey, Susan, Brian Leahy, Jonathan Redshaw, & Thomas Suddendorf. (2019). Could It Be So? The Cognitive Science of Possibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 24(1). 3–4. 17 indexed citations
15.
Suddendorf, Thomas, et al.. (2019). A taxonomy of mental time travel and counterfactual thought: Insights from cognitive development. Behavioural Brain Research. 374. 112108–112108. 20 indexed citations
16.
Nielsen, Mark, et al.. (2019). Children’s perceptions of the moral worth of live agents, robots, and inanimate objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 187. 104656–104656. 44 indexed citations
17.
Wilks, Matti, Jonathan Redshaw, Ilana Mushin, & Mark Nielsen. (2019). A cross-cultural investigation of children’s willingness to imitate prosocial and antisocial groups. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 185. 164–175. 7 indexed citations
18.
Crimston, Charlie R., et al.. (2018). The developmental origins of moral concern: An examination of moral boundary decision making throughout childhood. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0197819–e0197819. 26 indexed citations
19.
Suddendorf, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Preparatory responses to socially determined, mutually exclusive possibilities in chimpanzees and children. Biology Letters. 13(6). 20170170–20170170. 28 indexed citations
20.
Redshaw, Jonathan & Thomas Suddendorf. (2016). Children’s and Apes’ Preparatory Responses to Two Mutually Exclusive Possibilities. Current Biology. 26(13). 1758–1762. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026