Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Shaping the Halal into a brand?
2010420 citationsJonathan A.J. Wilson, Jonathan LiuJournal of Islamic marketingprofile →
The challenges of Islamic branding: navigating emotions and halal
2011416 citationsJonathan A.J. Wilson, Jonathan LiuJournal of Islamic marketingprofile →
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary perspective and future research agenda
202473 citationsJustin Paul, Akiko Ueno et al.International Journal of Consumer Studiesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Liu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Liu. The network helps show where Jonathan Liu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Liu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Liu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Liu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Liu. Jonathan Liu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Paul, Justin, Akiko Ueno, Charles Dennis, et al.. (2024). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary perspective and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 48(2).73 indexed citations breakdown →
Ghobadian, Abby, Philip James, Jonathan Liu, & Howard Viney. (2014). A spatial approach to mapping corporate environmental behaviour. International Journal of Environment and Pollution.1 indexed citations
5.
Stainer, Alan, Abby Ghobadian, Jonathan Liu, & Lorice Stainer. (2014). Strategic investment appraisal for advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology.2 indexed citations
Wilson, Jonathan A.J. & Jonathan Liu. (2011). The challenges of Islamic branding: navigating emotions and halal. Journal of Islamic marketing. 2(1). 28–42.416 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Wilson, Jonathan A.J. & Jonathan Liu. (2010). Shaping the Halal into a brand?. Journal of Islamic marketing. 1(2). 107–123.420 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Ghobadian, Abby, Nicholas O’Regan, Howard Thomas, & Jonathan Liu. (2008). Formal strategic planning, operating environment, size, sector and performance. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).6 indexed citations
Ghobadian, Abby, Hong Seng Woo, David Gallear, Howard Viney, & Jonathan Liu. (2001). Benchmarking: concept and practice with particular reference to the finance function. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
Liu, Jonathan, et al.. (1996). International Market Research: A Financial Perspective.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.