Jonathan Lamb

753 citations
36 papers · 247 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Lamb

26 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

Jonathan Lamb
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Museology 24
  • Literature and Literary Theory 71
  • Geography, Planning and Development 22
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • History 34
Replace Duncan Wu with:
Duncan Wu United States
Nancy Moore Goslee United States
Allan Ingram United Kingdom
Leo Steinberg United States
Ira Nadel Canada
François Dagognet France
John Mullan United States
Stephen M. Archer
Leslie A. Marchand Netherlands
Christine Ferguson United Kingdom
Jonathan Lamb relative to Duncan Wu United States Duncan Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Duncan Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lamb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lamb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lamb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lamb. The network helps show where Jonathan Lamb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lamb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lamb Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lamb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201252
2 201127
3 200127
4 201924
5 201515
6 200414
7 200911
8 20169
9
Exploration & exchange : a South Seas anthology, 1680-1900
20008
10 20078
11 20087
12 19956
13
The New Zealand Sublime
19905
14 20115
15 19815
16 19804
17 19803
18 19892
19 20112
20 19812

About Jonathan Lamb

Jonathan Lamb is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), New Zealand Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Comparative and World Literature (1 paper) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (24 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (22 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations) and History (34 citations). Jonathan Lamb has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Fiona E. Harrison, James M. May, Vanessa Agnew, Vanessa Smith, Clare Anderson, David Armitage, Alison Bashford and Sujit Sivasundaram. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, Huntington Library Quarterly, Eighteenth-Century Fiction, ELH and Eighteenth-Century Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact