Middle East Policy

1.1k papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Middle East Policy in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Middle East Policy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (881 papers), Political Science and International Relations (558 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (60 papers) specifically the topics of Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (487 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (335 papers) and Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Middle East Policy are Michael Rubner, Guilain Denoeux, Emilie Rutledge, Ingo Forstenlechner, Ahmed S. Hashim, Jahangir Amuzegar, Thomas Hegghammer, Michael M. Gunter, M. Hakan Yavuz and Ian S. Lustick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Middle East Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Middle East Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Middle East Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Middle East Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Middle East Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Middle East Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Middle East Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025