Jonathan Fielden
Impact in
-
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Annette Boaz (3 shared papers)Louise Locock (3 shared papers)Melanie Gager (3 shared papers)Sue Ziébland (3 shared papers)Sofia Vougioukalou (3 shared papers)Glenn Robert (3 shared papers)Caroline Shuldham (2 shared papers)Jean‐Roger Le Gall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (1 paper)Journal of Health Organization and Management (1 paper)Intensive Care Medicine (1 paper)The Hematology Journal (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyIsrael
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Fielden
10 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 65
- Family Practice 21
- General Health Professions 193
- Epidemiology 140
- Emergency Medicine 39
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Fielden
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Fielden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Fielden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Fielden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Fielden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Fielden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Fielden. The network helps show where Jonathan Fielden may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Fielden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 1 |
About Jonathan Fielden
Jonathan Fielden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Health Information Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (65 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), General Health Professions (193 citations), Epidemiology (140 citations) and Emergency Medicine (39 citations). Jonathan Fielden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Annette Boaz, Louise Locock, Melanie Gager, Sue Ziébland, Sofia Vougioukalou, Glenn Robert, Caroline Shuldham, Jean‐Roger Le Gall, Herwig Gerlach and Yasser Sakr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Intensive Care Medicine, The Hematology Journal and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.