Countries where authors publish in The Hematology Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Hematology Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Hematology Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Hematology Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Hematology Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Hematology Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Hematology Journal.
About The Hematology Journal
The 359 papers published in The Hematology Journal in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations . Papers published in The Hematology Journal usually cover Hematology (194 papers), Genetics (107 papers) and Immunology (68 papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (56 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (55 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (51 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (44 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (34 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (34 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (31 papers) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Hematology Journal are Laura Forte, Angelo Tocci, Manal H. El‐Sayed, Zeynep Karakaş, Işık Yalçin, Leyla Ağaoğlu, Mohsen Saleh Elalfy, Emili Montserrat, Nuray Gürel and Yen‐Lin Chee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.