Paul Chinnock

915 citations
17 papers · 518 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Chinnock

17 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Paul Chinnock
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 73
  • Emergency Medicine 103
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Family Practice 5
  • General Health Professions 66
Replace Mike Gardner with:
Mike Gardner United Kingdom
Eric A. Tesdahl United States
Abdo Asmar United States
Michele Levinson Australia
David M. Lam United States
Mario Chico‐Fernández Spain
Keiji Muramatsu Japan
Janel Swain Canada
Nian Chih Hwang Singapore
Christopher Eric McCoy United States
Paul Chinnock relative to Mike Gardner United Kingdom Mike Gardner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Mike Gardner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Chinnock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Chinnock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Chinnock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Chinnock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Chinnock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Chinnock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Chinnock. The network helps show where Paul Chinnock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Paul Chinnock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Chinnock Line = papers co-authored together Paul Chinnock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201481
2 200478
3 200876
4 200571
5 201467
6 198842
7 200540
8 200521
9 201516
10 20059
11
Is evidence-based medicine relevant to the developing world? Systematic reviews have yet to achieve their potential as a resource for practitioners in developing countries
20054
12 20053
13
DOTS: a five-point strategy.
19973
14 20173
15 20062
16 20041
17
Malaria control programmes: Are ITNs the way forward?
19991

About Paul Chinnock

Paul Chinnock is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 17 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Older Adults Driving Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (73 citations), Emergency Medicine (103 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Family Practice (5 citations) and General Health Professions (66 citations). Paul Chinnock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Katharine Ker, Ian Roberts, Nandi Siegfried, Frances Bunn, Mike Clarke, David Nabarro, Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi, Irene Kwan and Gill Schierhout. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Injury Prevention, PLoS Medicine, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact