Jonathan de Quidt
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 4
- Safety Research top 2%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 5
-
- FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance 4
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Microfinance and Financial Inclusion 5
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 2
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 2
- Accounting top 10%
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies 3
-
- Auction Theory and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Johannes HaushoferChristopher RothMaitreesh GhatakThiemo FetzerSimone QuerciaFelix KölleDaniele NosenzoFrancesco Fallucchi
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Jonathan de Quidt
16 papers receiving 550 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- General Decision Sciences 61
- Safety Research 158
- Management Information Systems 93
- Economics and Econometrics 288
- Accounting 114
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan de Quidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan de Quidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan de Quidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan de Quidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan de Quidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan de Quidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan de Quidt. The network helps show where Jonathan de Quidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan de Quidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 5 | Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demandbreakdown → | 2018 | 331 |
| 6 | Depression through the Lens of Economics: A Research Agenda | 2017 | 12 |
| 7 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 12 | Depression for Economists | 2016 | 0 |
| 13 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 64 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 14 |
About Jonathan de Quidt
Jonathan de Quidt is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Management Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (4 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (61 citations), Safety Research (158 citations) and Management Information Systems (93 citations). Jonathan de Quidt has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Haushofer, Christopher Roth, Maitreesh Ghatak, Thiemo Fetzer, Simone Quercia, Felix Kölle, Daniele Nosenzo, Francesco Fallucchi, Konrad Burchardi and Gharad Bryan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.