Itai Danovitch
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Waguih William IsHakBrennan SpiegelMatthew GoldenbergMark W. ReidBradley T. RosenDavid A. GorelickBrigitte VanleSameer Hassamal
- Topics
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (13 papers)Treatment of Major Depression (10 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Itai Danovitch
56 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Pharmacology 494
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 330
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 310
- General Health Professions 274
- Physiology 265
Countries citing papers authored by Itai Danovitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Itai Danovitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Itai Danovitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Itai Danovitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Itai Danovitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Itai Danovitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Itai Danovitch. The network helps show where Itai Danovitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Itai Danovitch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Itai Danovitch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Itai Danovitch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Itai Danovitch. Itai Danovitch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 144 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 242 | |
| 12 | Psychological Interventions in Inpatient Medical Settings: A Brief Review | 2 |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 204 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 76 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Itai Danovitch
Itai Danovitch is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Biological Psychiatry and Pharmacology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (13 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (10 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (249 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (168 citations) and Pharmacology (494 citations). Itai Danovitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Waguih William IsHak, Brennan Spiegel, Matthew Goldenberg, Mark W. Reid, Bradley T. Rosen, David A. Gorelick, Brigitte Vanle, Sameer Hassamal, Brandon Birckhead and Kim Bullock. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The American Journal of Medicine and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.